IETF Logo Mail Archive

I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Thu, 19 March 2015 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCBB1A8848 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O71ZCZ7UeO3x for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-po-11v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-11v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9718E1A8846 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.233]) by resqmta-po-11v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 5XuD1q00752QWKC01XuJud; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:54:18 +0000
Received: from Mike-T530ssd.comcast.net ([69.255.115.150]) by resomta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id 5XuH1q0093Em2Kp01XuHro; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:54:18 +0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:54:21 -0400
To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment - timebomb
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_755594867==.ALT"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1426794858; bh=GSK5VMQE+uP0bA0pG+xlSxTK1iSp0NJpBtPCsyN+g5w=; h=Received:Received:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=tXwbs4q34johG2bcx3QhGbAZUyVQbmnHcsV+5Bn9hba40Tu9sE6WWPdAUwObf1pC2 hqv1JmjFaIS3S6pzDl85L2nsF8JS7wed9F3ja6O4GW67CSHlqP6FeeBs1IZOpRvtg/ lbiKCGaETpU3SPQNA8hxAz/XQ3JjZXjb0wEh6Uc/sRxKLK3Lsy30+/to2U2Z3lu1px wrfjCxsgGYFaPooOrCXfSIo96oMYTrvwmPKlSag42zeF9rfYnxOG47aIVgMFb1Sv47 kF7A70/VwlmxpIwizxLVZSlqYkaFUZbaJ+PepJR8+I/qLePU3MHVIIfWgqWXshngIg cPOOmOSzDkywQ==
Message-Id: <20150319195418.9718E1A8846@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zeJGVJVkYDvjsIdUf-w0UK2Z-2s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 19:54:19 -0000

Version -06 of draft-farresnickel-harassment has this small phrase that was added in this version:


>   Any definition of harassment prohibited by an applicable law can be
>   subject to this set of procedures.

I find "prohibited by an applicable law" to be somewhat problematic and overreaching.

This should be removed.  If something is a violation of applicable law, then the folks responsible for that law should deal with it, not us.  We should be dealing with harassment that impinges on the IETFs creation of standards and not with harassment that has little or no nexus with the IETF.  

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email