IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Non-Terminal Room

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Sat, 18 July 2015 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1BD1A1A19 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBFBt8J3eX8R for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FED21A1A02 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-04.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8782DA0089 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:19:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.241] (71.233.41.235) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:19:51 -0700
Message-ID: <55AAD106.9010702@nominum.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:19:50 -0400
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Non-Terminal Room
References: <3F72F273-A420-4769-8E26-53DBE89B0607@isc.org> <55AAB947.2050100@restena.lu> <423EDF6E7415B588A95C0135@P5> <CAHw9_i+ojR+3j+pOTL6tD0Wt8E_0Rqj8eEzV2DJMqAbCgTQQvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+ojR+3j+pOTL6tD0Wt8E_0Rqj8eEzV2DJMqAbCgTQQvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zitCMfCWvKr6jee2GFW1phy1w7U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:20:00 -0000

On 07/18/2015 04:54 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> No, it is simply always the very last room in the line..
Indeed, if you don't have a terminal room, you get ringing, which 
corrupts packets and leads to bad latency.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status