IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Non-Terminal Room

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sun, 19 July 2015 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E602B1A010D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sN4ucL1GcUVq for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6BE1A00FA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC567C06F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:21 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67MJ6oUW-d3y for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:e190:20fd:9b5e:945d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:e190:20fd:9b5e:945d]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32FB37C052A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <55AB44EB.8000602@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 08:34:19 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Non-Terminal Room
References: <3F72F273-A420-4769-8E26-53DBE89B0607@isc.org> <55AAB947.2050100@restena.lu> <423EDF6E7415B588A95C0135@P5> <CAHw9_i+ojR+3j+pOTL6tD0Wt8E_0Rqj8eEzV2DJMqAbCgTQQvA@mail.gmail.com> <55AAD106.9010702@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <55AAD106.9010702@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Jr2GsPg3aY1IWmVkIcr0hQaIYI8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 06:34:23 -0000

On 07/19/2015 12:19 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On 07/18/2015 04:54 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> No, it is simply always the very last room in the line..
> Indeed, if you don't have a terminal room, you get ringing, which
> corrupts packets and leads to bad latency.
>
/me briefly considers whether "ringing" can be applied to the vision of
IETF oldtimers restlessly pacing back and forth in the corridor looking
for the terminal room....

-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status