Re: [EAI] 81 IETF EAI meeting minutes

Agreed.

The text should parallel the text that describes the use of the
UTF8SMTPbis parameter when the contents of the message or
envelope are not known to require EAI (i.e., non-ASCII)
capability.  That means that those who are concerned about that
type of advice should check the existing text carefully to be
sure it reflects WG agreements about the matter.

   john

--On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 15:23 +0000 John Levine
<johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> 
>> Header-bis (draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-11): 
>> a) Tentative consensus results:
>> - General support for UTF-8 in Message-IDs
>> - General support for including important commentary
>>  material from earlier versions in one or more appendices
>>  to the current organization of the draft.
> 
> I think there was support for my request to reword sec 3.4 a
> little to clarify that it's OK to use message/global for
> messages that would be valid message/rfc822, although for
> maximum backward compatibility it's preferable not to do so.
> 
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima