IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in Message-IDs consensus

John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <klensin@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B34621F8D2A for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SuhCYVArptzy for <ima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3AE21F8D1E for <ima@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1R3wza-000MCt-Az; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:27:38 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:27:36 -0400
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
To: Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>, ima@ietf.org
Message-ID: <14D07F2441ADA2EBD5D53677@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <E14011F8737B524BB564B05FF748464A32B73F18@TK5EX14MBXC133.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <E14011F8737B524BB564B05FF748464A32B73F18@TK5EX14MBXC133.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [EAI] UTF-8 in Message-IDs consensus
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:25:35 -0000

--On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 19:17 +0000 Shawn Steele
<Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com> wrote:

> I'm happy with this; I'm fine with any extra text being in the
> advice doc, unless it is very simple & quibble-proof :)

With the understanding that this should not affect the consensus
call results, could people clarify which "advice document" they
have in mind?  From a quick look at the charter, there are four
possibilities:

(1) Reopen draft-ietf-eai-frmwrk-4952bis (now in the RFC Editor
queue) and put text there.

(2) Advice for non-ASCII & ASCII addresses
(3) Advice for MUA implementors
(4) Advice for EAI deployment

Note that no I-Ds for any of the last three documents have been
posted, indeed, the WG hasn't made a formal decision to move
forward with any (much less all) of them.  We have decided to
not make that decision until the protocol documents are under
control and we can appraise how much actual energy there is to
complete the work.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email