IETF Logo Mail Archive

encapsulation / conversion bounce (Re: [EAI] Proposal for decision, approach for downgrading in UTF8SMTP)

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 11 October 2006 07:10 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXYEu-0002At-Ir; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:10:52 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXYEt-0002Ao-Ck for ima@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:10:51 -0400
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXYEr-0006PX-1r for ima@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:10:51 -0400
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC26B2596BB; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:08:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06019-03; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:08:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD0E2596BD; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:08:08 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <452C98F0.4040802@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:10:40 -0700
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta+gmane@siilo.fmi.fi>
Subject: encapsulation / conversion bounce (Re: [EAI] Proposal for decision, approach for downgrading in UTF8SMTP)
References: <0DB08D0582395ACFD523BB3E@7AD4D3FB4841A5E367CCF211> <5d3b9wkb4o.fsf@Hurtta06k.keh.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <5d3b9wkb4o.fsf@Hurtta06k.keh.iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Cc: ima@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ima-bounces@ietf.org

Kari,

please be specific - I can't tell what you are thinking about.

Please use the language from draft-ietf-eai-scenarios, and describe a 
specific scenario in which you think that "encapsulation strategy" may 
succeed, while "conversion strategy" requires a bounce, and explain why.

Note: Encapsulation by the sender will be allowed as soon as someone 
delivers on the promise to write up a draft on what the MIME part for an 
encapsulation should look like - but this isn't in the critical path of 
this effort....

                               Harald

Kari Hurtta wrote:
>
>
> I was thinking requiring "conversion strategy", but I was looking cases
> where "encapsulation strategy" may succeed (when "conversion strategy"
> may require bounce.)
>
> If these cases ("conversion strategy" bounces, "encapsulation strategy" 
> succees), are many, then "encapsulation strategy" should have permitted as
> optional.
>
> / Kari Hurtta
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima
>
>   


_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
IMA@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email