Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07

Joseph Yee <jyee@ca.afilias.info> Mon, 21 September 2009 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jyee@ca.afilias.info>
X-Original-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ima@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8103A68F6 for <ima@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1lXFsFB4EKxn for <ima@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [69.46.124.26]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC223A6AC8 for <ima@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms6.yyz2.afilias-ops.info ([10.50.129.112] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@ca.afilias.info>) id 1MpnBa-0005sS-5E; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:00:26 +0000
Received: from tor-gateway.afilias.info ([199.15.87.4] helo=jyee-lt.tor.afilias-int.info) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@ca.afilias.info>) id 1MpnBa-0002s2-80; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:00:26 +0000
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@ca.afilias.info>
To: barryleiba@computer.org
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a0909201409n472d85f1xe87526b6f86ac9c9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20090830222724.034fdb30@elandnews.com> <6c9fcc2a0909010725m9f1a4c2x159fb13d05df5f91@mail.gmail.com> <4A9D9878.7010302@isode.com> <p06250105c6c5c5428ce9@172.16.1.8> <6c9fcc2a0909031518v3e826ff2je1b622a6acfdd59a@mail.gmail.com> <4AA96B90.7070007@isode.com> <6c9fcc2a0909101550i13d01c93tca7be5bccbf1c0b6@mail.gmail.com> <4AAA20BD.1060904@isode.com> <C814D069-77BE-4C2A-ACFE-5A5F87A20558@ca.afilias.info> <4AB67A8C.2090202@alvestrand.no> <6c9fcc2a0909201409n472d85f1xe87526b6f86ac9c9@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <EB488ECA-DCF7-4116-ADE5-BE7333B4A05E@ca.afilias.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:00:26 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, EAI WG <ima@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [EAI] Comments on draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-07
X-BeenThere: ima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAI \(Email Address Internationalization\)" <ima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ima>
List-Post: <mailto:ima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima>, <mailto:ima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:59:35 -0000

On 20-Sep-09, at 5:09 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:

>> My sense of the WG is that the WG doesn't feel that being creative  
>> in how
>> IMAP options are specified is something this WG wants.
>
> Hm.  I don't read that at all, from the few responses we have.  That
> said, I'm happy to accommodate:
> I propose that we take my previous note, with all the changes
> suggested in it, but we modify the way the capabilities are specified.
> Instead of "UTF8=x,y,z", we have "UTF8=x UTF8=y UTF8=z".  In
> particular, that means that there is no "UTF8" capability, and that is
> instead called "UTF8=ACCEPT".
>
> That should satisfy me, John, and Dave, as well as making Alexey and
> Joseph feel better.
>
Barry,

I feel good either way :)

I guess what's left is to document (or not to document) all  
implications.

Joseph


> Is that cool?
>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> IMA mailing list
> IMA@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima