Re: [imap5] Where is IMAP5 ?

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Wed, 20 July 2011 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D310F21F8751 for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2skl8hgR760v for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0979421F87D3 for <imap5@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (kalyani.aox.org [79.140.39.164]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609B0FA00EA; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.1.3) with esmtpsa id 1311167547-1279-1278/9/918; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:12:27 +0200
Message-Id: <4E26D43A.1090906@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:12:26 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Organization: Me, http://arnt.gulbrandsen.priv.no
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: imap5@ietf.org
References: <4E23FB2A.10200@panozzo.it> <op.vytcthr22qqnnh@arbre.eng.oslo.osa> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1107181145570.66343@hsinghsing.panda.com> <20110718190947.GB8329@brong.net> <4E24B55C.1050507@laposte.net> <1311115679.3432.2153661013@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4E2637C3.7090704@laposte.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E2637C3.7090704@laposte.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [imap5] Where is IMAP5 ?
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:12:30 -0000

On 07/20/2011 04:04 AM, Gilles LAMIRAL wrote:
> Breaking the current postmen/mailboxes model just to save bandwidth that
> is doubling every 6 months is intense thinking, congratulations!

Bandwidth isn't doubling every six months, unless you constrain the 
comparison to an IMO unrealistic degree.

I had about as much bandwidth yesterday as I had in 1995. The change is 
that yesterday I read mail on the train, which I couldn't do at all in 
1995. Last year I read mail in rural India, albeit with as little 
bandwidth than I had in 1990-2. Amazing progress, but IMO the real 
change is that the network has grown.

Arnt