Re: [imap5] Where is IMAP5 ?

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> Mon, 18 July 2011 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: imap5@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5288A21F8A66 for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AY-IIFREfo4S for <imap5@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E1521F8A4E for <imap5@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448E420923; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:22:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=vGiEgVp42bV+9DSwmM/uH2dsb9Y=; b=W965CK2LUEwuApt7gzmSlENKaYmSF5F0sAV99O+QuRpoPUxA+gsBWlswOPhOhooWx8Ea8tB5+tvtegc8HXek8fHpMeKQmd1O5pO2K2vpJgn8rtFwobSMy/Y/2wzdqz0i3VQ8y/bkgz/tAUcrRkvuiufmISH72RXsQXasq1wbxds=
X-Sasl-enc: C7lSTeP4RAQCMJZlYj8X8bx8/una42T3uPoW3Bw+yGt0 1311016964
Received: from localhost (56.243.9.46.customer.cdi.no [46.9.243.56]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07CE8403E33; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:22:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 150B62020C; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:22:43 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:22:43 +0200
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <20110718192243.GA13165@brong.net>
References: <4E23FB2A.10200@panozzo.it> <op.vytcthr22qqnnh@arbre.eng.oslo.osa> <p06240612ca4a10bce7de@loud.pensive.org> <20110718183429.GA5192@brong.net> <p06240618ca4a329ebdda@loud.pensive.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p06240618ca4a329ebdda@loud.pensive.org>
Organization: brong.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: imap5@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [imap5] Where is IMAP5 ?
X-BeenThere: imap5@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion on drastically slimming-down IMAP." <imap5.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/imap5>
List-Post: <mailto:imap5@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5>, <mailto:imap5-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:22:47 -0000

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:02:10PM -0700, Randall Gellens wrote:
> Solutions which seem to work but don't handle anything except the
> most obvious case can be dangerous.  For a while it was common for
> people to use fetchmail to retrieve mail via POP and then relay it
> via SMTP.  This is one of those solutions that seems to work but
> because it only has access to the data (the envelope being gone) can
> result in unpleasant problems.

Sure.  Except if you can optimise the most obvious case you can
actually improve life for most users, most of the time.  I'm
not proposing anything radical like "discard SMTP submission".
I'm just saying that if all you want to do is store a message to
your sent folder and have it dropped into a deliver queue, then
making it too complex to implement will be worse than making it
simple.

Bron.