RE: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB
"Bert Wijnen - IETF" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Fri, 04 January 2008 17:23 UTC
Return-path: <imss-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqGC-0005zk-2Y; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:08 -0500
Received: from imss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqGB-0005zT-1k for imss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:07 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqGA-0005zI-O3 for imss@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:06 -0500
Received: from relay.versatel.net ([62.250.3.110]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqG8-0008Bf-FB for imss@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 91904 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2008 17:23:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bwMedion) (87.215.199.34) by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 4 Jan 2008 17:23:02 -0000
From: Bert Wijnen - IETF <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
To: Keith McCloghrie <kzm@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:23:15 +0100
Message-ID: <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNMELDEEAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <200801041617.IAA12026@cisco.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 14582b0692e7f70ce7111d04db3781c8
Cc: imss@ietf.org, Black_David <Black_David@emc.com>, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-BeenThere: imss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet and Management Support for Storage Working Group <imss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:imss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: imss-bounces@ietf.org
Inline Bert Wijnen > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Keith McCloghrie [mailto:kzm@cisco.com] > Verzonden: vrijdag 4 januari 2008 17:18 > Aan: Bert Wijnen - IETF > CC: imss@ietf.org; Keith McCloghrie; Black_David; Dan Romascanu > Onderwerp: Re: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB > > > Bert, > > I believe that with my responses below, I have now responded to all of > the comments that you have sent for this I-D. Further, especially > given the number and size of the MIB modules, we thank you for > expending the large amount of effort needed to provide all the > comments. > > > This is a review of the module as extracted from the > > prelimenary draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcsp-mib-01.txt document > > > > - I see: > > > > t11FcSpZoningMIB MODULE-IDENTITY > > LAST-UPDATED "200702190000Z" > > ORGANIZATION "T11" > > > > I think that IETF IMSS WG should be included as one of > > the ORGANIZATIONs that worked on this MIB module > > Done. > > > - I have seen > > > > t11FcSpZoneSetHashStatus OBJECT-TYPE > > SYNTAX INTEGER { > > calculate(1), > > correct(2), > > stale(3) > > } > > > > That SYNTAX a number of times in the set of MIB modules. > > Candidate for a TC? > > Done. > > > - FOr that same object, I wonder how a re-calculate can be done > > for a permanent row, since the storage type states: > > > > If an instance of this object has the value > > 'permanent(4)', the Zone Set database for the given > > fabric on the given switch is not required to be > > writeable." > > Assuming that I've correctly understood your question, I'll add: > a sentence in the DESCRIPTION of t11FcSpZoneSetHashStatus to say: > > If and when the corresponding instance of > t11ZsServerDatabaseStorageType (defined in RFC 4936) has the value > 'permanent(4)', then if any the instance of an object in if any row :if any the instance" ?? do you mean "if any instance" "in if any row" ?? maybe remove the last "if" ?? > of any table governed by t11ZsServerDatabaseStorageType has an > object that is writable, then so too must be the corresponding > instance of this object. > > OK? > Not sure I underatand, so you say this one only needs to be writable if any other wrietable object is writable? I am confused? > > - Same question about counter discontinuities as in my earlier > > MIB reviews yesterday. > > I hope the same answer I gave to them will suffice here also. > That one is OK with me. Hope the WG understood/understands the implications and agrees as well. Bert > Thanks, > Keith. > > > _______________________________________________ > imss mailing list > imss@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss > _______________________________________________ imss mailing list imss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss
- [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB Bert Wijnen - IETF
- Re: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING… Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING… Bert Wijnen - IETF
- Re: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING… Keith McCloghrie
- RE: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING… Bert Wijnen - IETF