RE: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB

"Bert Wijnen - IETF" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Fri, 04 January 2008 17:23 UTC

Return-path: <imss-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqGC-0005zk-2Y; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:08 -0500
Received: from imss by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqGB-0005zT-1k for imss-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:07 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqGA-0005zI-O3 for imss@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:06 -0500
Received: from relay.versatel.net ([62.250.3.110]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAqG8-0008Bf-FB for imss@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:23:06 -0500
Received: (qmail 91904 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2008 17:23:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bwMedion) (87.215.199.34) by relay.versatel.net with SMTP; 4 Jan 2008 17:23:02 -0000
From: "Bert Wijnen - IETF" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
To: "Keith McCloghrie" <kzm@cisco.com>
Subject: RE: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:23:15 +0100
Message-ID: <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNMELDEEAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <200801041617.IAA12026@cisco.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 14582b0692e7f70ce7111d04db3781c8
Cc: imss@ietf.org, Black_David <Black_David@emc.com>, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-BeenThere: imss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet and Management Support for Storage Working Group <imss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:imss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss>, <mailto:imss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: imss-bounces@ietf.org

Inline

Bert Wijnen 

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Keith McCloghrie [mailto:kzm@cisco.com]
> Verzonden: vrijdag 4 januari 2008 17:18
> Aan: Bert Wijnen - IETF
> CC: imss@ietf.org; Keith McCloghrie; Black_David; Dan Romascanu
> Onderwerp: Re: [imss] MIB doctor review for T11-FC-SP-ZONING-MIB
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
> I believe that with my responses below, I have now responded to all of
> the comments that you have sent for this I-D.  Further, especially
> given the number and size of the MIB modules, we thank you for
> expending the large amount of effort needed to provide all the
> comments.
> 
> > This is a review of the module as extracted from the
> > prelimenary draft-ietf-imss-fc-fcsp-mib-01.txt document
> > 
> > - I see:
> > 
> >    t11FcSpZoningMIB  MODULE-IDENTITY
> >       LAST-UPDATED  "200702190000Z"
> >       ORGANIZATION  "T11"
> > 
> >    I think that IETF IMSS WG should be included as one of
> >    the ORGANIZATIONs that worked on this MIB module
>  
> Done.
> 
> > - I have seen
> > 
> >    t11FcSpZoneSetHashStatus OBJECT-TYPE
> >        SYNTAX       INTEGER {
> >                      calculate(1),
> >                      correct(2),
> >                      stale(3)
> >                     }
> > 
> >    That SYNTAX a number of times in the set of MIB modules.
> >    Candidate for a TC?
> 
> Done.
> 
> > - FOr that same object, I wonder how a re-calculate can be done
> >   for a permanent row, since the storage type states:
> > 
> >            If an instance of this object has the value
> >            'permanent(4)', the Zone Set database for the given
> >            fabric on the given switch is not required to be
> >            writeable."
> 
> Assuming that I've correctly understood your question, I'll add: 
> a sentence in the DESCRIPTION of t11FcSpZoneSetHashStatus to say:
> 
>     If and when the corresponding instance of
>     t11ZsServerDatabaseStorageType (defined in RFC 4936) has the value
>     'permanent(4)', then if any the instance of an object in if any row

:if any the instance" ??  do you mean "if any instance" 
"in if any row" ?? maybe remove the last "if" ??


>     of any table governed by t11ZsServerDatabaseStorageType has an
>     object that is writable, then so too must be the corresponding
>     instance of this object.
> 
> OK?
> 

Not sure I underatand, so you say this one only needs to be writable
if any other wrietable object is writable?
I am confused?

> > - Same question about counter discontinuities as in my earlier 
> >   MIB reviews yesterday.
> 
> I hope the same answer I gave to them will suffice here also.
> 
That one is OK with me.
Hope the WG understood/understands the implications and agrees as well.

Bert
> Thanks,
> Keith.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> imss mailing list
> imss@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss
> 


_______________________________________________
imss mailing list
imss@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imss