Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 14 September 2018 19:42 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404F5130E68 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:42:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86HcEhrsdDJv for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C64130E3A for <insipid@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w8EJgVbS080409 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:42:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.roach.at
To: "Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group" <Peter.Dawes@vodafone.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "Arun Arunachalam (carunach) (carunach@cisco.com)" <carunach@cisco.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking@ietf.org>, "insipid@ietf.org" <insipid@ietf.org>, "gsalguei@cisco.com" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "insipid-chairs@ietf.org" <insipid-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <153437875319.3073.15951759162383331116.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM5PR0501MB24659A3566177F30C6B48623973E0@AM5PR0501MB2465.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <a9436eb5-8f8e-2795-0c8d-83ab3dd84b0b@nostrum.com> <AM5PR0501MB24652A98561FDA52551A4F1897010@AM5PR0501MB2465.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <78ba4459-a9fd-0eda-10f4-f01c0324b916@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:42:26 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0501MB24652A98561FDA52551A4F1897010@AM5PR0501MB2465.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------71A0C79C3AB8CD622DF3BFFE"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/8JRDxrPEF4R9dNcz0gmYx9YdYJo>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-insipid-logme-marking-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 19:42:46 -0000
Hi! Thanks, these all look like good resolutions to the issues I raised. I have a small handful of editorial nits (below). They're extremely minor, and all have to do with hyphenation of compound adjectives. /a On 9/6/18 5:42 AM, Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group wrote: > oIf a dialog is to be marked, the only way to initiate "log me" > > marking is at the dialog creating request (e.g.SIP INVITE) sent > "...dialog-creating request..." > oIf a "log me" aware endpoint or intermediary that is already "log > 'If a "log me"-aware endpoint...' > oIf a "log me" aware endpoint or intermediary that is not "log me" > 'If a "log me"-aware endpoint...' > > oBy requesting header and session level privacy from SIP > > intermediaries using the Privacy header > "...header- and session-level privacy..."
- [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf… Adam Roach
- Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group
- Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Adam Roach
- Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Dawes, Peter, Vodafone Group
- Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Adam Roach
- Re: [Insipid] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-… Arun Arunachalam (carunach)