IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Insipid] [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 22 August 2013 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A638C11E81C5 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBlknGenY6yu for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76AE11E810A for <insipid@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Fvyz1m00B0mv7h05Dw48Lg; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:04:08 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Fw481m0063ZTu2S3Xw48CF; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:04:08 +0000
Message-ID: <52166EB8.7050308@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:04:08 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128B4D41@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> <5216458A.5040608@nostrum.com> <45C07F42-21DD-45BF-B9F4-CCFC01B022FB@cisco.com> <52166B57.3010504@alum.mit.edu> <8CCA7EA1-84CE-4EB3-BF48-2971C117E3B1@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8CCA7EA1-84CE-4EB3-BF48-2971C117E3B1@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1377201848; bh=88V4npdynsa3H34QY3BGqgT2beRGwxc4Ucli2W3q7qE=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=DrY7/yD24EZ/Ey41Pi5obVsjbOleWQ+DXfBEUA+aAEYyawQXiOzvYWIytcgB9FIOr cBCIfSOE/U32ZMCS7/jptLgaKbadYd7IPXrQVpKwj6ghc8x1ME3Ex/+CitCHOFUZo0 OqDAU7y3FQ7/xv91Uuah72ucZXXonLeK7Wx0g5y3/itGTFanBs3VjQ/87X8qbzPLXS 40I3SpBQM75zJcf2tvoGgQ+ltgGoE1mcO1BK90Xjd2YH15AJqXTLLydKYRro/BkqKB NiPa2YAn1t5ksUWg6mrUjff4ujaWX4tTN5JA3LhGwfXNhI4/yDMDX2f9lKHAQRH83+ 47gK9EMbSD42A==
Cc: insipid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Insipid] [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-kaplan-insipid-session-id-03.txt
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:04:14 -0000

On 8/22/13 3:57 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro wrote:
> Well it is documented in the minutes as something the WG agreed to.  See similar post:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/current/msg00614.html

Then it ought to be recorded in someplace binding.
A new requirement would be a good way.

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Cheers,
>
> --G
>
> On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
>   wrote:
>
>> On 8/22/13 1:30 PM, Gonzalo Salgueiro wrote:
>>
>>> It should also explain that documeny has the responsibility to assure backwards compatibility with this document.
>>
>> AFAIK the WG has no *responsibility* to assure backwards compatibility.
>> Its not mentioned in the charter, or in the requirements.
>>
>> IMO its a "nice to have", nothing more.
>>
>> 	Thanks,
>> 	Paul
>> _______________________________________________
>> insipid mailing list
>> insipid@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email