IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-12: comments

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Fri, 23 January 2015 04:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169DA1A0154 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:23:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDE5853manaH for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D0361A0151 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 20:23:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] (cpe-098-027-048-015.nc.res.rr.com [98.27.48.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0N4NVso014848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:23:32 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1421987012; bh=2o+znOYG+Mvqi4/2aXkfQcwZVn9ZPwnDNIqhX6DIIs8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Reply-To; b=nrU3JuccS9O+WpszjQ4cf7gS7ONaxffnInk5IHxj5f0RvC793nb7w65wyXEd+DLaX dab4XC9V6NZAGtLYTZw7Hj3Gvn8pgrgSaZbh31TJ69T9Eivfc2YaRKjePrK4u5wBDJ M4/ID6s+d1F8fNE+OM2no8gmkHpzek/LE91dTKmU=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>, Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>, draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@tools.ietf.org, insipid@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:23:41 +0000
Message-Id: <em2e612313-c475-4c80-a06b-11f48ddede49@sydney>
In-Reply-To: <em37ff103a-3044-4061-a066-ad64d62d4a32@sydney>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.21372.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/M3FKYK4NT4eMUbOqZoDbakYPq-I>
Subject: Re: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-12: comments
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 04:23:36 -0000

Brett,


>>Section 9.1 F2, F3, and F5: Since UDP is the default transport, you 
>>might
>>want to change the top Via's transport to be UDP within F2, F3, and 
>>F5.
>
>Unless there is a good reason to change these, I'd prefer to leave 
>them. UDP is still widely used, but TLS is also extremely common. It's 
>important that we don't have an error here, of course. Any errors or 
>just a preference for UDP.

Actually, that would be "TLS".  Nonetheless, the question remains: is 
there a reason to change them to UDP?  If we do, I'd prefer to change 
all references to UDP just so it's all consistent.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email