[Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-20: comments

Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> Tue, 26 April 2016 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <brett@broadsoft.com>
X-Original-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: insipid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AE412B069 for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=broadsoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxNwloZu1CDI for <insipid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E357412B038 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x231.google.com with SMTP id m9so22780506ige.1 for <insipid@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadsoft-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QnRFYY8KMYvu84KKzRYz3j2qaLNpRi1lg6Kl6ioAdqo=; b=kgB+iG0X+V76aZKNns+QYbiLtveoqZ2YfvTIRDwyMu9QtixJRqhTSkNyEHCi1GO8nN nUCyObvMP/pZSbmGRzz5sNrE4JrMwsp7ap6/MoTzNORZ95gWlTdo+1C07YskPwxWzAh7 /VS05PVe9/OXO6sIkogK9uCe1xy+pWuS++/mEnw3NJrC+Ml7uqGmrbEQn6SaPNpB7i6p zN/rrZu4K90vJJKQ6jEbPGbJ5G4DkWq9VzXiNoRGEJT0/rUkxVqBssQZvEPGYDS75udt 0ApIHrWQDcjtaFAiEq/R7VCNepQFv+0ZwRLaaBRsqsmIljmiIpQZO2xHYPkWksHlc23h 7PJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=QnRFYY8KMYvu84KKzRYz3j2qaLNpRi1lg6Kl6ioAdqo=; b=U7cyJlyrLyDcBKJrhDHhnSbLHYPNXLnNDaxcGWOjol3mIdIrnP/Sfl+y1rEgkeAjBc Sin7LIPKMwl+nZzfO+QeGbaKFqfSklHXnh53hxgzYuzJ9Fs1k0g2zVE2gUw+Kssz4w25 ZlUmd6VhNlbCmav/meSWNHkyJXTnTTcVIntqmU8PzVbTZvJycTpCiUxfTbajweHL8KsS BCyOPSFSmwctWluucIYqVRvN3j1F+hH+jNi3MHuQa5nqQ1MXerSw57qtVNf/tBnNKhvB P3hnyy955vyeXyfpv9NiKTvIL5xeObPHHa4LCfg8iPs3wIYcD1faq/A7m/l/JnMzHJH+ 3vbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVlaV2EC5p+ZGvjAkIS3b/HvIkdMa3J8iC6tJSTWpVCL6ChPxBdHRsTcinuCUGgwlryOiLHip3I5feH3WOW
X-Received: by 10.50.64.178 with SMTP id p18mr21696497igs.83.1461700224160; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdGf9NP3vaJLxoJUQXGrG1XbQrmMcg==
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:50:23 -0400
Message-ID: <e1f210eaf0bfe04ab7effe2d24e15e21@mail.gmail.com>
To: insipid@ietf.org, draft-ietf-insipid-session-id@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/insipid/Mm-CWn_a3PQmu1-0LXVBmqDmhnM>
Subject: [Insipid] draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-20: comments
X-BeenThere: insipid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Session-ID discussion list <insipid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/insipid/>
List-Post: <mailto:insipid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/insipid>, <mailto:insipid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:50:26 -0000

Hi,

The following are some comments concerning
draft-ietf-insipid-session-id-20.

Thanks,
Brett

------

1) Section 7 paragraph 3: You might want to include section 8 as part of
the last sentence's exception since section 8 has the mandate to fix the
remote value.

2) Section 8 bullet 3: Last sentence contains "value value".

3) Section 8 bullet 5: Last sentence contains "value value".

4) Section 10.3 figure 3: Concerning last re-invite, should likely show
the B2BUA correcting the remote-uuid to be C and mention it within last
bullet.  This would comply with a MUST contained within section 8 last
paragraph.

5) Section 10.3 last bullet: Concerning "local-uuid" = "A", it looks like
"A" should be replaced with "C".  However, I might be incorrectly thinking
there is an implied {} around the two comma-separated values similar to
the explicit {} within prior bullets.