IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Decisions regarding IPv10 I-D.

Juan Carlos Zuniga <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org> Thu, 13 April 2017 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5B0129521 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwj2lUz-VKGx for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:40:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D85D129555 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id r203so71154560oib.3 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ci27eUnlw5tjt83nzdjyORKb/UrtWTy8aeR0+upPX7c=; b=lWZDu7DiW50BlxHmOOsGA8o1NY93FBji7gqon+8HNJjLIWkJ5d2DssHWqP4TLUGYWf fQ+86w/MB/CwuKDV1aDAkkbKrQrpa7AgKWIVN5Pp3bhkp22D0KXmfynppj0LSLoOO2jU ai8STc72rG8FSDZ4Wr97B8EniOY8FWMGl0BNN2kKaYz4IAiZbwJRKm3vORUVDWaXq3rn NmEMmGAC2JZS4xUF8vXdrnNMBLzHOhb/yHVBFnL+ju9cZ0Kf0sRmWQ3BJVadf3JRqAAE BK3U6yZIc/FUDi5GIjguwTfeW43sA2tVrz+hq6FezuxA8XoNw3/dlMahWPI6M+ezGja4 s+mA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ci27eUnlw5tjt83nzdjyORKb/UrtWTy8aeR0+upPX7c=; b=JSkSJ8Bf4c+4QB8aKzQB0QLb8UpOo/QM1y2cNcRDa0Chxt1Aje2BTtfDi8VotvOH6n fyyGw3VZCE5wZUBsBO1aHJsJQ4uboLt6McCJPBvuAM1YNKBxXTXL7o4/U2hDsi7IoqyK SFgmtIj3hlv65zT4y3nntuSdVWUpMVKGF6sgonA5GOj+ob0csv7ZMkMIFfxyhjkxRgyZ HUFoYN3kayvqiSNEOiR0RqnQNWqhaQCE5biaAeWMv2hOSOYDlFDfU4VRYKRD5e+HPS5d rQh6vSOSV6DI1iuqTaHHbp5vXiTRIjTPQ8ZLay37Mu+54fKaWJoU/KfyNwht5ogPzxIh 276A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6ImUvbvpJ2KdpJO3Giha/EUzOYV+s8V9gDFe00MT9DQnXQIgAk CEyQGAHEStxcSA/hv56Ip9zAYOfNZUmF
X-Received: by 10.202.61.65 with SMTP id k62mr2237823oia.43.1492101639562; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.221.65 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 09:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D50ABB91.766DC%lee@asgard.org>
References: <D50ABB91.766DC%lee@asgard.org>
From: Juan Carlos Zuniga <j.c.zuniga@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:40:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHLBt82q5SaLpSUoDtvg9vEkd7qPMrkw++cLP5jWy+AQs6K+qQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Cc: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>, "intarea-ads@ietf.org" <intarea-ads@ietf.org>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cc1e8320cc8054d0efc39"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/-nq3vObZUJBFSQkOyzKGT4wnUvI>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Decisions regarding IPv10 I-D.
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:40:44 -0000

Hello all,

As explained to Khaled, since there is no rough consensus and based on the
technical feedback, we will not be progressing the draft.

Thanks to Christian, Lee, Mikael, and others for their technical reviews
and procedural advice given to the author.

Best,

Juan Carlos & Wassim
(IntArea WG chairs)

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org> wrote:

> To move forward, there must be a clear and documented consensus, as judged
> by the WG chairs (as you can see at  https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ they
> are Wassim Haddad and Juan-Carlos Zúñiga). Then the WG would adopt the
> draft, make edits, and make a WGLC (Working Group Last Call). If there was
> consensus, there would be an IETF Last Call.
>
> Based on email traffic, if the WG tried to adopt this, I would appeal the
> decision.
>
> You have another choice: Independent Submission, see rfc6548. The
> Independent Submission Editor has different requirements and processes, and
> is designed for alternate perspectives. However, based on the technical
> objections raised here, I do not think your draft would meet the editorial
> standards of the ISE.
>
> To understand the process, I recommend https://www.ietf.org/tao.html, and
> https://www.ietf.org/edu/tutorials.html
>
> Lee
>
>
>
> From: Int-area <int-area-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Khaled Omar <
> eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM
> To: "intarea-ads@ietf.org" <intarea-ads@ietf.org>
> Cc: "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <
> intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Int-area] Decisions regarding IPv10 I-D.
>
> Hi ALL,
>
>
>
> Is there any official decision will be taken regarding the IPv10 I-D
> whether assigning to a reviewer, changing the status, or publishing the
> Standard.
>
>
>
> Of course all of you know that the added value by this I-D will affect all
> of us in a positive way so we shouldn’t wait more than that.
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
> Khaled Omar
> _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email