Re: [Int-area] Decisions regarding IPv10 I-D.

To move forward, there must be a clear and documented consensus, as judged
by the WG chairs (as you can see at  https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ they
are Wassim Haddad and Juan-Carlos Zúñiga). Then the WG would adopt the
draft, make edits, and make a WGLC (Working Group Last Call). If there was
consensus, there would be an IETF Last Call.

Based on email traffic, if the WG tried to adopt this, I would appeal the
decision. 

You have another choice: Independent Submission, see rfc6548. The
Independent Submission Editor has different requirements and processes, and
is designed for alternate perspectives. However, based on the technical
objections raised here, I do not think your draft would meet the editorial
standards of the ISE.

To understand the process, I recommend https://www.ietf.org/tao.html, and
https://www.ietf.org/edu/tutorials.html

Lee

From:  Int-area <int-area-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Khaled Omar
<eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Date:  Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM
To:  "intarea-ads@ietf.org" <intarea-ads@ietf.org>
Cc:  "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org"
<intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject:  [Int-area] Decisions regarding IPv10 I-D.

> Hi ALL,
>  
> Is there any official decision will be taken regarding the IPv10 I-D whether
> assigning to a reviewer, changing the status, or publishing the Standard.
>  
> Of course all of you know that the added value by this I-D will affect all of
> us in a positive way so we shouldn¹t wait more than that.
>  
> Best Regards,
>  
> Khaled Omar 
> _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area