[Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-09.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 16 April 2013 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB0D21F9027; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8l3qW-A7kTz4; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:43:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE1121F93E2; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.43.p4
Message-ID: <20130416054256.22902.78357.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:42:56 -0700
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 05:43:03 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
 This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier (HOST_ID) in Shared Address Deployments
	Author(s)       : Mohamed Boucadair
                          Joe Touch
                          Pierre Levis
                          Reinaldo Penno
	Filename        : draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-09.txt
	Pages           : 23
	Date            : 2013-04-15

Abstract:
   This document is a collection of solutions to reveal a host
   identifier (denoted as HOST_ID) when a Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) or
   application proxies are involved in the path.  This host identifier
   could be used by a remote server to sort out the packets by sending
   host.  The host identifier must be unique to each host under the same
   shared IP address.

   This document analyzes a set of solution candidates to reveal a host
   identifier; no recommendation is sketched in the document.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-09

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-09


Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/