Re: [Int-area] draft-shirasaki-isp-shared-addr and Class E networks

Dave,
>
> It might be usable between routers in an ISP.

Which is the exact application on NAT444 that was presented at the  
intarea. We are talking about the 4 "in the middle" and only for new  
builds.

Roque

> It is not really usable to assign a general-purpose PC acting as a  
> CPE.
>
> -Dave
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: int-area-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Roque Gagliano
>> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 1:02 PM
>> To: int-area@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Int-area] draft-shirasaki-isp-shared-addr and Class E
>> networks
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> After the presentation on the intarea session yesterday I though  
>> about
>> something that was said ( I do not remember the person that did the
>> comment) in the last NANOG meeting during the panel: " What Would Jon
>> have Done About the Addressing Challenges Currently Facing Us?".
>>
>> The comment was about what Jon Postel did with the cable companies  
>> and
>> the 24/8 network. He allocated the address block but forced the cable
>> companies to test CIDR. In that sense he gave something and got
>> something.
>>
>> I wonder if we could take that example for the "shared address" case
>> and re-activate the re-definition of the Class E space as "for  
>> private
>> use" (draft-wilson-class-e-02) in order to be able to be use for this
>> architectures if the ISP are willing to do so.
>>
>>
>> Roque
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAkknIcoACgkQnk+WSgHpbO4kVwCgpHb6F3WO+9UHYQRyyeDhd44G
>> JzgAn34S3xolZmhopok7ZtLgTt4mPZP7
>> =DzEa
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Int-area mailing list
>> Int-area@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Re: [Int-area] draft-shirasaki-isp-shared-addr and Class E networks

Attachment: PGP.sig