IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Int-area] draft-shirasaki-isp-shared-addr and Class E networks

Roque Gagliano <roque@lacnic.net> Fri, 21 November 2008 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <int-area-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: int-area-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-int-area-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248043A689E; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:02:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D01B3A6977 for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:02:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.072
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.072 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_IP_ADDR=1.119, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C3wYj3Q7XjqA for <int-area@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D093A689E for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.95.209] (unknown [130.129.95.209]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1963084A4 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:02:19 -0200 (UYST)
Message-Id: <F7593B6C-C664-41F4-A744-CD1A503D75F4@lacnic.net>
From: Roque Gagliano <roque@lacnic.net>
To: int-area@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:02:02 -0600
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail d51 (Leopard)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: roque@lacnic.net
Subject: [Int-area] draft-shirasaki-isp-shared-addr and Class E networks
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: int-area-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: int-area-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

After the presentation on the intarea session yesterday I though about  
something that was said ( I do not remember the person that did the  
comment) in the last NANOG meeting during the panel: " What Would Jon  
have Done About the Addressing Challenges Currently Facing Us?".

The comment was about what Jon Postel did with the cable companies and  
the 24/8 network. He allocated the address block but forced the cable  
companies to test CIDR. In that sense he gave something and got  
something.

I wonder if we could take that example for the "shared address" case  
and re-activate the re-definition of the Class E space as "for private  
use" (draft-wilson-class-e-02) in order to be able to be use for this  
architectures if the ISP are willing to do so.


Roque
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkknIcoACgkQnk+WSgHpbO4kVwCgpHb6F3WO+9UHYQRyyeDhd44G
JzgAn34S3xolZmhopok7ZtLgTt4mPZP7
=DzEa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email