IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-area] Where to aggregate, where to drop

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 06 April 2022 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D497E3A1742 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEz6lMo7o4kc for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C44093A0DDD for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id f3so987358pfe.2 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=8grAbhC1Ycf6uig3V/GTkinUDSaRXWUk2x/tS5/9nr0=; b=pJxPfVzoGiurspWMhF1Psqco7QDCKcPi1UaKtTtdw46+hEnkoK7RaEpRLQnmC5Dk3P iI1TzkWIErwfohQHM60woomjH5Xo3tpg+J3ftJVLgwCaJ2ip99o7LfzaYlxpahn8brvC dg5XIZGWvL9aYsY0UqYG8tBx3tGV4DcRa4KNLnjDCS+rK3c8SL/KRUdz9HS+Hbo9wjKx 9UXwLwryLMMsSLox4bY3AWCglfVOCp19b5IjVJ4U6UqgKJ/RUJp1Qail3KiuKWlZiXYR oYt1MTeE+XJ6R15q4EzKUz1q4zGhfi+Ri5tc9dqwcsda3w9hisGANgllCLtn67hWx82G 0gOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=8grAbhC1Ycf6uig3V/GTkinUDSaRXWUk2x/tS5/9nr0=; b=b3880VwLtVJhAAPEX21rHKJci6t+sKcBUezB7o4WcpQAN2lF7OAaohAW9vNvNyr8H+ zqA2MxYA4BHCC0UDRjwUHbavTlAjdrNxG5hlYSZ09DMmJ5J+uyIuRx9Vb3ksOUlIyzdL q6mWvtvN6SEOjFIGwG8KCZVHgmZ0fPKG7N+OuSO2XgkJHkJFyI4zeHX33331JdgoSSqB 2Ssab9ou3GYH6Sv5pdViuWH8Y6k1TKwMfZC5X/6cozzIodrtnAFAyE87Mof5oHH7KhIi Tm1wPdkfJ4zxYvZ+w2H66oyjl9/NMGSLNT6tJOlBT29c9mHxfEW1U5PUyedMH6KezsUC mDXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FxOpWCP9Lq5tRpeda/RVrNyJR2YsQiH+2IohsG6eijb+LCOqQ JQ/PKuQnrZFv8Eqhi0h713V9gd5+MVw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjUxcQcBP7H52Ot4nTag2skrXSRJkBDe3CEJp9AoHTWlQSaH4/V8RFkMJF+cFwpKFisyKwKQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a02:204:b0:399:1c4:3f45 with SMTP id bh4-20020a056a02020400b0039901c43f45mr4823581pgb.246.1649204093555; Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:646:9600:fef0:699f:e992:9c06:8d49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f16-20020a056a00229000b004fabe756ba6sm18462358pfe.54.2022.04.05.17.14.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 17:14:50 -0700
Message-Id: <680425F4-754F-41D0-A5B2-937387E617F4@gmail.com>
References: <3E642B47-C7F6-440F-B558-90106EF33A46@comcast.net>
Cc: int-area <int-area@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3E642B47-C7F6-440F-B558-90106EF33A46@comcast.net>
To: Tony Li <li.tony@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19E241)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/i0NcckIzRIbJHRz0hzrM_Tg6xBI>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Where to aggregate, where to drop
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:14:56 -0000


> On Apr 5, 2022, at 4:47 PM, Tony Li <li.tony@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Not at all clear that its a small amount of bandwidth.
> 
> 
> Other than a DoS attack, why would it be significant?

Good point. It would only be for traffic to more-specifics that didn’t exist. 

> So the draft is supposed to help people think about it. :)

That’s what it did for me. 

> Do you think it’s worth of WG adoption?

I think so yes. 

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email