Re: [Int-area] [nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-05

Chema Gonzalez <chema@berkeley.edu> Wed, 15 March 2017 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <chemag@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30DA1293E1 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2OvgCe5LYl3T for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C42F1317FF for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id w124so41850282itb.1 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VDu/Is5I5qKKwQeoKb7uXrb+9j+UN1tHcbb5L4uDpNE=; b=n2xzkoCU6CplaORV3kOMOOinnIOmXf9bZyfRbKinMaD/ZBtiRRY4BFSpxNHogNWKln k2P7wzgnWec1gLK3tGSw7SZqCJTCQThpUaAcpQHVBpT/P21H4l/Ka5PMFwezzSaMzwiM 8huqJUqRKMhOeS3HprMDbbFgyvN88/+Fm/gb42CGdrXnwEp3FwyE59uAc1v6Uj4ROBue WDl0SnTQj1HHJ/EDm8eoaNlKfdEP/OmsOHCpH26ZMH1narfANri8ASB9LpqPgL3dRaD0 2R1nRnSTblEMb4UdHNfRlCgUsqpN8s8mRJJOIwI30VS47QAE9DbcO4l7/fFCbV8asaP+ o2kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=VDu/Is5I5qKKwQeoKb7uXrb+9j+UN1tHcbb5L4uDpNE=; b=Kpz6ar5KpJzIu1iLtGfUQxU4dG7KYP6mqmFc3nWTZd2xbsfa2XcUj1IrBy5yeo2Ze2 OuBBvYLehVqdkZLYL39BViygf7KywwejiDA0Sd6bhCOw+1T9QUsw5DPqpesSXfpJguvm hNn25gMfxIpu627J1lgYh23nv4XyAL5fVBPqWs/Tf62734+md8mEdN8huBx6buGJmZlC MdNduso+PEtR6upDh81uLRO8xxnqTiK8GKuvifr73dbDZVklkPmtu9AH1jW0+chK5OrJ StSTVclPqvVPbCGGWOiYAk/WbWHs8A6+ok6ULNyzVrR7AkqVMPfRWFTmj2fiK19Dji9l +beg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2Rtfxwywk8k1PyChecOGynYfAnuyMGmOjyvtnpZMmYjZ3NRg82puUk5/Lvg8PTOmBk/NNY81frd/Nurg==
X-Received: by 10.36.50.206 with SMTP id j197mr3105032ita.118.1489543278819; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: chemag@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.5.140 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chema Gonzalez <chema@berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:01:18 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q3F9x00i6rO4yvbiEQJpXDY2RiU
Message-ID: <CAEb0MfcqPsEukZr1m=0=w-mG4WSTU+G4WjzTTewyptt7GsaL9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: int-area@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/jB-iFk9V1T-19J6Aw4BKPolwU6Q>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] [nvo3] Comments on draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-05
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 02:03:25 -0000

2 minor comments:

1. There is a small typo. Where it says:

B.1. Priveleged ports

It should say:

B.1. Privileged ports

2. Not sure whether this is right or not: Sections 3.3.2 and 5.4.1
suggest the use of 94 as the next proto header value ("(proto =
94,IPIP)"). Both linux/include/uapi/linux/in.h and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_IP_protocol_numbers suggest the
right ipip value is 4. The wiki link suggests 94 was used by "KA9Q NOS
compatible IP over IP tunneling", while the linux kernel points at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nikander-esp-beet-mode-05.

Thanks,
-Chema