Re: [Int-area] [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-patterson-intarea-ipoe-health-03.txt

[Richard Patterson <[e-mail]>]

Hi Med,

Thanks once again for your review, comments, and support.
I'll address your bullet points in-line below.  I'll try to get a -04
out incorporating your feedback before the cut off.


On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 at 09:29, <[e-mail]> wrote:
> The main comments:
> * Use 3 as default retry interval value (consistent with BBF TR-124 and some existing implementations).

Have reworded the parameter definition to:
- Limit (Integer): The number of failed consecutive checks before an
action is taken. Default value: 3.

> * Generalize the procedure to cover any dynamic configuration means (DHCP, as an example among others).

I agree for the most part, but I'm unsure about considering TR-69 as
dynamically signalled.  I was treating TR-69 as a method for local
configuration (which we've now changed to static in -03).
I think the idea is the same though, so I'll work your suggested wording in.

> * Add a guard to prevent loopback and multicast addresses as alternate target @

Is saying that the field must be a unicast address sufficient, or do
you want to specifically call out loopbacks and multicast?

> * Double check some part of the text to reflect that both interval and retry-interval are now used.
>
> I do support this effort to be adopted in dhcwg or int-area.
>
> Cheers,
> Med