Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax

"Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 08 December 2021 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911393A0596 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=boeing.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzMEl-e3O0nG for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.144.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54EB63A0791 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id 1B8H9BQr016503; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:09:11 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com; s=boeing-s1912; t=1638983351; bh=v9w4xmblpJ2MxVVyfZKWyyXEDWXs/SSmUfPBMiJnKsA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=NTz1Vme7Npz0YgdsxjdjYB62AAhInNWUmSvj+44XwB7ImVetO56DbsvHCEQxOse/s o5Twf6oJNf+EvFAwztq1h8AvguBCvH+/pu2jqNOBv+wRAs55+3vYxeMfg/Rp+f8UvE BUZWQnIKm9lFvsWZVyzAhgAkzANtsR0O/lw0R7TP5pf5W2hMl9kWfuu4ahgAliR/QQ coILTPwWZAegkDmyGw4zvMWGjEe2LLycB29IkYQht5hT0qWKl83j1ir3Vbi16Q4uA6 QsY1gF0wW7fFgSTclrvQC3jRvb8mGpHzZS7cB+rGcJS1CoeyE0PUEE47HX/bwcRolJ GpuCDE4VKEAzw==
Received: from XCH16-07-08.nos.boeing.com (xch16-07-08.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.110]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id 1B8H97Ol016440 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:09:07 -0500
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.112) by XCH16-07-08.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2308.14; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:06 -0800
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5]) by XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5%2]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.014; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:06 -0800
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax
Thread-Index: AdfsUvaafuCx+WBFSmWfzsTOChfQKg==
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:09:06 +0000
Message-ID: <212a92089d984cf993fb0039d2de6506@boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: F8477E9A8B291C04F0C0E795B678379C82BACFCD65658BB15ACCB8BFC7BB60362000:8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/lYSkxAWqadXCGKNqDAESukLPQVc>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:09:31 -0000

Sorry Alex, I spoke imprecisely. In ATM, there is one fixed cell size but for
heterogeneous Internetworks the 576 determines only a lower bound for cell
sizes - not an upper bound. In ATM the fixed cell size is 53 octets (5 octets header;
48 octets payload), but for heterogeneous Internetworks we need to leave a lot
of extra room for headers. So we define a "minimum Maximum Payload Size
(minMPS)" of 400 octets. That leaves a generous 176 octets for encapsulation
headers, which will most often not be fully consumed due to header compression.

Again, this defines only the minimum MPS; larger MPS values can be discovered
through path probes, or can be set optimistically under the risk of encountering
unexpected size restrictions.

Fred

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2021 6:16 AM
> To: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax
> 
> The advantage of talking 'minimum cell size' (MCS?) instead of 'maximum
> transmission unit' (MTU) is in that it fits better to a preceding
> 'minimum' qualifier.
> 
> A 'minimum MTU' term expands to a 'minimum maximum transmission unit'.
> That construct can be ambiguous to an implementer.  Is it a 'minimum
> transmission unit'?  Or is it the smallest of all MTUs of all link designs?
> 
> On another hand, a 'minimum minimum cell size' is clearly just a minimum
> cell size, just further accentuated in its minimization: a 'minimum
> minimorum' if one wishes.  Where MCS is 576 a minimum MCS in IPv6 could
> be 41: 40 bytes of header and 1 byte of payload.  Or maybe 40 if there
> is no payload.  Or maybe 321 bits if there is just one bit of payload
> (an on/off switch or flag in IoT speak).
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 08/12/2021 à 02:38, Templin (US), Fred L a écrit :
> > This conversation is missing some fundamental points – really the
> > most important
> >
> > points – which are the minimum sizes guaranteed to work everywhere.
> > For IPv6,
> >
> > the minimum MTU/MRU are 1280/1500. For IPv4, they are only 68/576 but
> > since
> >
> > the IPv4 network supports fragmentation we can nominally designate
> > the IPv4
> >
> > minimum MTU as 576 also if we clear the DF bit. It means that,
> > without probing
> >
> > or having some divine knowledge of paths that have not been
> > previously visited,
> >
> > the ONLY sizes guaranteed to work are 1280 for IPv6 and 576 for
> > IPv4.
> >
> > Now take the case of Multinet where a path may traverse multiple
> > concatenated
> >
> > IP networks of arbitrary IP protocol versions - remember “Catenet”?
> > Since there
> >
> > may be no advanced knowledge of network IP protocol versions, the
> > most we can
> >
> > absolutely and for sure count on across the entire path is 576.
> >
> > What this gives us is not the **maximum packet size**; instead, it
> > determines the
> >
> > **minimum cell size**. We know that a 576 cell will traverse all
> > paths, so we never
> >
> > send a non-final cell smaller than this (which might trigger a tiny
> > fragment alarm).
> >
> > But, we can certainly send packets larger than the path MTU -
> > **much** larger in
> >
> > many cases. And for paths that support them, we can also send Brian’s
> > jumbograms.
> >
> > Speaking of jumbos, on a different list I made a point about how this
> > all harkens back
> >
> > to RFC1149 and RFC6214. But nowadays, we can imagine substituting a
> > memory stick
> >
> > for the slips of paper with whitestuff and blackstuff and those avian
> > carriers will
> >
> > transport jumbos just fine. Not quite unlimited MTU, but close
> > enough.
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing
> > list Int-area@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area