Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax
"Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 08 December 2021 17:09 UTC
Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911393A0596 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=boeing.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzMEl-e3O0nG for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.144.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54EB63A0791 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id 1B8H9BQr016503; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:09:11 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com; s=boeing-s1912; t=1638983351; bh=v9w4xmblpJ2MxVVyfZKWyyXEDWXs/SSmUfPBMiJnKsA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=NTz1Vme7Npz0YgdsxjdjYB62AAhInNWUmSvj+44XwB7ImVetO56DbsvHCEQxOse/s o5Twf6oJNf+EvFAwztq1h8AvguBCvH+/pu2jqNOBv+wRAs55+3vYxeMfg/Rp+f8UvE BUZWQnIKm9lFvsWZVyzAhgAkzANtsR0O/lw0R7TP5pf5W2hMl9kWfuu4ahgAliR/QQ coILTPwWZAegkDmyGw4zvMWGjEe2LLycB29IkYQht5hT0qWKl83j1ir3Vbi16Q4uA6 QsY1gF0wW7fFgSTclrvQC3jRvb8mGpHzZS7cB+rGcJS1CoeyE0PUEE47HX/bwcRolJ GpuCDE4VKEAzw==
Received: from XCH16-07-08.nos.boeing.com (xch16-07-08.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.110]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id 1B8H97Ol016440 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:09:07 -0500
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.112) by XCH16-07-08.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2308.14; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:06 -0800
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5]) by XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5%2]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.014; Wed, 8 Dec 2021 09:09:06 -0800
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "int-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax
Thread-Index: AdfsUvaafuCx+WBFSmWfzsTOChfQKg==
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:09:06 +0000
Message-ID: <212a92089d984cf993fb0039d2de6506@boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: F8477E9A8B291C04F0C0E795B678379C82BACFCD65658BB15ACCB8BFC7BB60362000:8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/lYSkxAWqadXCGKNqDAESukLPQVc>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area WG Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 17:09:31 -0000
Sorry Alex, I spoke imprecisely. In ATM, there is one fixed cell size but for heterogeneous Internetworks the 576 determines only a lower bound for cell sizes - not an upper bound. In ATM the fixed cell size is 53 octets (5 octets header; 48 octets payload), but for heterogeneous Internetworks we need to leave a lot of extra room for headers. So we define a "minimum Maximum Payload Size (minMPS)" of 400 octets. That leaves a generous 176 octets for encapsulation headers, which will most often not be fully consumed due to header compression. Again, this defines only the minimum MPS; larger MPS values can be discovered through path probes, or can be set optimistically under the risk of encountering unexpected size restrictions. Fred > -----Original Message----- > From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandre Petrescu > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2021 6:16 AM > To: int-area@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want from the Internet? minmax > > The advantage of talking 'minimum cell size' (MCS?) instead of 'maximum > transmission unit' (MTU) is in that it fits better to a preceding > 'minimum' qualifier. > > A 'minimum MTU' term expands to a 'minimum maximum transmission unit'. > That construct can be ambiguous to an implementer. Is it a 'minimum > transmission unit'? Or is it the smallest of all MTUs of all link designs? > > On another hand, a 'minimum minimum cell size' is clearly just a minimum > cell size, just further accentuated in its minimization: a 'minimum > minimorum' if one wishes. Where MCS is 576 a minimum MCS in IPv6 could > be 41: 40 bytes of header and 1 byte of payload. Or maybe 40 if there > is no payload. Or maybe 321 bits if there is just one bit of payload > (an on/off switch or flag in IoT speak). > > Alex > > Le 08/12/2021 à 02:38, Templin (US), Fred L a écrit : > > This conversation is missing some fundamental points – really the > > most important > > > > points – which are the minimum sizes guaranteed to work everywhere. > > For IPv6, > > > > the minimum MTU/MRU are 1280/1500. For IPv4, they are only 68/576 but > > since > > > > the IPv4 network supports fragmentation we can nominally designate > > the IPv4 > > > > minimum MTU as 576 also if we clear the DF bit. It means that, > > without probing > > > > or having some divine knowledge of paths that have not been > > previously visited, > > > > the ONLY sizes guaranteed to work are 1280 for IPv6 and 576 for > > IPv4. > > > > Now take the case of Multinet where a path may traverse multiple > > concatenated > > > > IP networks of arbitrary IP protocol versions - remember “Catenet”? > > Since there > > > > may be no advanced knowledge of network IP protocol versions, the > > most we can > > > > absolutely and for sure count on across the entire path is 576. > > > > What this gives us is not the **maximum packet size**; instead, it > > determines the > > > > **minimum cell size**. We know that a 576 cell will traverse all > > paths, so we never > > > > send a non-final cell smaller than this (which might trigger a tiny > > fragment alarm). > > > > But, we can certainly send packets larger than the path MTU - > > **much** larger in > > > > many cases. And for paths that support them, we can also send Brian’s > > jumbograms. > > > > Speaking of jumbos, on a different list I made a point about how this > > all harkens back > > > > to RFC1149 and RFC6214. But nowadays, we can imagine substituting a > > memory stick > > > > for the slips of paper with whitestuff and blackstuff and those avian > > carriers will > > > > transport jumbos just fine. Not quite unlimited MTU, but close > > enough. > > > > Fred > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing > > list Int-area@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
- [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact fea… Dirk Trossen
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dirk Trossen
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dirk Trossen
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Tom Herbert
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Jiayihao
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dirk Trossen
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Tom Herbert
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Joe Touch
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Tom Herbert
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Jiayihao
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Tom Herbert
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Jiayihao
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Side meeting follow-up:… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Side meeting follow-up:… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Dino Farinacci
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Hesham ElBakoury
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Jiayihao
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Jiayihao
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [Int-area] [EXTERNAL] Re: Side meeting follow… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Jiayihao
- Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact… Alexandre Petrescu