Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-shen-traceroute-ping-ext-03.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 08 January 2012 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3167121F8492 for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 03:00:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.585
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KMhozTK-Tw6Y for <int-area@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 03:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE8021F8491 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 03:00:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q08AxwiB027312 for <int-area@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 03:00:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1326020407; i=@resistor.net; bh=RWDabot/d52akus+tcpXXksOlxlQdH+kfekrJGbh0KM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=nhc5SQVbtAybaEK/dBBAylMNXOxznIlIdJuiEz7BabxUhqaMMJ0tgzcffpLjLbgmu qt295d1fGXsakTi2u/MpnyrUwvO77isUfPhNSuYR+87NDmiJ8z44KfO00RSq8V01nj j0xf97N9A+jzd2YwxXunSF1Ixo9aPX7KZwGUzgk4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120108022206.0c765c58@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:49:39 -0800
To: int-area@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <B5B3DB49-80B1-4C44-B561-7DD9B65C8523@kumari.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D74ED699B3@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <4F04B6B8.6030208@cisco.com> <201201042243.q04Mhpk8014959@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <7E187243-EAB3-4814-A78C-56DCEAE2C67C@cisco.com> <B5B3DB49-80B1-4C44-B561-7DD9B65C8523@kumari.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-shen-traceroute-ping-ext-03.txt
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/int-area>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 11:00:16 -0000

At 12:44 07-01-2012, Warren Kumari wrote:
>If ping processing goes from being a negligible use of resources to 
>something noticeable, the only reasonable solution I have is "deny 
>icmp any any echo" on edge.
>This is not good for me, this is not good for my customers, this is 
>not good for the Internet at large.

Agreed.

If the authors really want to see draft-shen-traceroute-ping-ext-03 
published, they could add an Applicability Statement saying that the 
domain of use is not the Internet.  Not giving due consideration to 
input from operators can only discourage them from providing input in future.

Regards,
-sm