Re: [Int-area] request to consider sponsoring http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

On 3/6/2014 8:28 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> Greetings int-area and hiaps-mailing-list folks,
>
> I realize that this is midweek at the IETF, however this question is not
> far from several discussions I've had this week.
>
> I have been asked to consider AD sponsoring
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04
>
> In the process of  considering doing so I'd like to get some input with
> respect to:
>
> A. The appetite for pursuing some or any of this work in existing
> working groups, and in particular within the INT area.

Given that draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis is in INT, and this 
document expands on that, I think this belongs in INT.

> B. A consensus basis for moving beyond RFC 6269 into active work in this
> area.

See my response to (A). INT is already active in that area.

> C. How we address concerns raised by the IETF community expressed
> through  draft-farrell-perpass-attack when evaluating scenarios and
> beginning to address requirements and solution-space.

That should definitely be addressed in this doc.

Joe