[Int-dir] Updated to draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Tue, 24 July 2018 07:58 UTC
Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BD8131045; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yVx5WDAtQdRo; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E95213103F; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C8BFF1BE07BFB; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 08:58:17 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.33) by LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.399.0; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 08:58:18 +0100
Received: from DGGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.59]) by DGGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([fe80::74d9:c659:fbec:21fa%31]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:58:15 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, "suresh@kaloom.com" <suresh@kaloom.com>
CC: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Updated to draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
Thread-Index: AdQjIocmCzD23NI5SSKNDh+gpxToiQ==
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:58:15 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68BBC14F03C@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.74.202.215]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/2lXG1AchJIP2sPltfP8--Ntssj0>
Subject: [Int-dir] Updated to draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 07:58:26 -0000
Hi Dave and Suresh, We have updated the document to Version 09. The following is its links: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-09 We believe it resolves all comments raised during the Intdir early review and by others. B.R., Yuanlong on behalf of all coauthors -----Original Message----- From: Dave Thaler [mailto:dthaler@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 5:59 AM To: int-dir@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; tictoc@ietf.org Subject: Intdir early review of draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07 Reviewer: Dave Thaler Review result: Ready with Nits I have reviewed draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07 as assigned int-dir reviewer. The draft was readable and technically good (though I am not an expert on either YANG or IEEE 1588-2008. I do have a number of nits indicated in the marked up copy at https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/uploads/prod/2018/06/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-07.pdf The most notable piece of feedback is that it's not clear what the units are for several integer objects. Dave
- [Int-dir] Updated to draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yan… Jiangyuanlong