IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-06

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 24 July 2018 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7F613119E; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nM42yqMhkka8; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com (mail-lj1-f176.google.com [209.85.208.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C46F1311A8; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id u7-v6so4483840lji.3; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KwucOeDj4lz9JWq6G17neLQ7s0evjsJtQ1mER7KpdDI=; b=Q3fscmFveOHK+r4481dPqr1KCecnQ9p9Vu9qAQMzA0gNCsLBdNPZN/KHEQoIRiCdjA I1glL5tpOJhBPWsAunQYEvTluwQMqRyvhUEIBCDhCeRRIKJIigbfacVwxlCzCMb5aQmr J3Eg/iq5iBw8rGtE0eiherQoACgSLutfRtkFAFPpWHBk/hARr6E9EapEqlJTaVkmlNfZ ROIXBl1YaAgHVlGNRze4VUYa6yEWw4W1o14mcYSHjoXx+luQv+HMujEtpZWnH82iMGCY iA3emq/fODyqOFpXz7z5rjPPwbTnm4DmrFLstVd2B8XJIKcHRdt56U2CPs7FSG//ckpe Elvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHB5wTak26aMdpyjZoqAmBHEJ9o4w3UTHEGjRyNGluhhAfEct+P ixW04GMxqipYteFPyFpn2cRKB5OrBlbtRAIoeaQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcgRIFaV5oFInYDBTNakwrBu3FgtgZiGVF+tek/cmsvz85vstyGztALlAbEg+8gs5M1ovGbkRi9Mg5vbGvmfPY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7113:: with SMTP id m19-v6mr12568874ljc.66.1532457708626; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <OF1157BAFE.321ACDDC-ONC12582CD.00503836-C12582CD.00611566@ptb.de>
In-Reply-To: <OF1157BAFE.321ACDDC-ONC12582CD.00503836-C12582CD.00611566@ptb.de>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:41:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcc+MG3zwAGXMyR4-DhEqvak2bc71Heqc0ZiskKPTd+Uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dieter.sibold@ptb.de
Cc: ntp-chairs@ietf.org, int-ads@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-ntp-bcp@ietf.org, "<int-dir@ietf.org>" <int-dir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/Fz1i-KyPje0ckqgWVivA_oSoTvk>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-06
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:41:53 -0000

At Tue, 17 Jul 2018 19:40:24 +0200,
dieter.sibold@ptb.de wrote:

> in our reply from June 30 we described the measures we intended to take in order to address your concerns you expressed in your review from Jun 15  of draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-06. In the meantime we added your proposed changes to a new version of the draft. This version is not yet uploaded to the datatracker but accesssible under
> https://github.com/denisreilly/ntp-bcp/blob/master/draft-ietf-ntp-bcp-07.xml
> We would very much appreciate if you could review the changes. Please let us know if we addressed your concerns appropriately.

Sorry for the delayed response...somehow it's been buried in my
inbox.  As it seems to contain some organizational changes I'm going
over the entire text once again.  I now understand my DISCUSS-level
point is actually based on a wg consensus, so that's not an issue
anymore.  I hope I'll provide my revised review feedback tomorrow.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email