Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-savi-mix-11

"Jun Bi" <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn> Mon, 17 October 2016 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDE512962F; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSw72b7RnM4N; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tsinghua.edu.cn (smtp36.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.204.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC431294C4; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from junbi-X1-2 (unknown [59.66.24.121]) by app2 (Coremail) with SMTP id C8xvpgAX+FwE9QRYgj8eAA--.1334S2; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:57:56 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 23:57:48 +0800
From: Jun Bi <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>, int-dir <int-dir@ietf.org>
References: <EA05E400-B692-4877-ADFC-9AE72E4D8BA0@gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 7, 174[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <201610172357482630457@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart334423883605_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: C8xvpgAX+FwE9QRYgj8eAA--.1334S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7WFyrur15uF4fZry5AFW8Zwb_yoW8Wr1xpa 97Wr12krWkJw1xC3s7AF1rury8CrZ3JrWUuF98X342v398G3W0kFWI9FZ0va4UJF1xXFW8 JrWI9r95J3Z5ZaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUkSb7Iv0xC_Zr1lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr0_ Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s 0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVCF0I0E4I0vr24lYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAF wI0_JrI_JrylYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0x vY0x0EwIxGrwACY4xI67k04243AVAKzVAKj4xxM4xvF2IEb7IF0Fy26I8I3I1lc2xSY4AK 67AK6ryrMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx2IqxVCjr7xvwV AFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUXVWUAwCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv2 0xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4 v20xvaj40_Zr0_Wr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAF wI0_Jr0_Gr1l6VACY4xI67k04243AbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvj7UU6G8UUUUU
X-CM-SenderInfo: xmxquxo6wvx0pjkxthxhgxhubq/
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/Dz_9_MJJUO4TGaevaLBnJkTxYI0>
Cc: "draft-ietf-savi-mix@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-savi-mix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Review of draft-ietf-savi-mix-11
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:58:02 -0000

Dear Ralph,

Thank you very much for the review !
We will submit a revised version according to your comments.





Best Regards,

Jun Bi
 
From: Ralph Droms
Date: 2016-10-15 21:39
To: int-dir
CC: draft-ietf-savi-mix
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-savi-mix-11
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-ietf-savi-mix-11>.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet
Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these
comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF
contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments
that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate,
see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html
 
I have one technical issue with the document.  In my opinion, the
document would benefit from a little more detail regarding how the
binding table is used for filtering.  Even a sentence to the effect of
“It is beyond the scope of this document to describe the details of
the filtering mechanism and its use of the combined SAVI binding
table.” would be helpful.
 
In section 7, I don’t understand “the principle of decision is reasonable”
Can this phrase be reworded for clarity?
 
The document needs a review for consistency, english language usage
and spelling.    For example, this sentence appears in section3:
 
   If more than one SAVI method is enabled on a SAVI
   device, the method is referred to as "mix address assignment method"
   in this document.
 
but the phrase "mix address assignment method" appears nowhere else in
the document.
 
- Ralph