IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 13 October 2016 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AF1129460 for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a79XLP2Nz7rL for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A103129431 for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z190so72256932qkc.2 for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nCF/8r6oXA64xAS6nPQGG8GtN8F9aWa5jOcOLg9rIRk=; b=rNEyOOPnd5V3tQ9a/3D0NxKbrpoAJcqvTcTdRjckF3abvKgAaaFyrwOLVErzWOD9RR djtQQkH4cjdcU2FgZky0D3cmbrJrUEmD9gYaeo2tQaWe/4cqAi8OtnPNkYddlzgy6s9c EjTpjEagFqftE8m5pZ0AwLC/a+U1KYsV1tc+zTPEMjT9/vOXCicPAI3sTcYbPhxmDydv pyoCNAKu+PyMF0lsGjgTBzvYizuIH8I5Z1X+GQhRLZRbT0AJMz18Ig815P4AcL6lsFzS dwzBD9hb9WM35HLsWS8Tg/RdbTeHJA05950s6pErzhOuJsB+92Bu8+2RYQ4dEWH9yNky he8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:organization:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nCF/8r6oXA64xAS6nPQGG8GtN8F9aWa5jOcOLg9rIRk=; b=BKDNT5g5p9U1p1JD8bSLslVjpUgDq/i3QCgAZzgM3JKpFPk1PTeucqI0dmdknzl/f+ IUqH+lG3s4Ge3/xSze0EWGx6ajwo9r06vQs1OFONO2eXYWGgUxnjV+VBf+L0m57eQhN5 bacRJWcajnnNgskMKZPtfpl8Ywi+9AnwWW4rgJQlW2AUpud6l0MIqG09ZaJdv8AZZgfr jY1b8j3O9QRKUZRSLp49v0rvtNyQwsJE89vkproUavpuEJ5otT6W/Oueu61xLtSB3aco 4QnllaYdpnLY2teQpD/bHMWZF82f6C5xrfzlzbEhJKAubCaPlrtypKo33iBT9KUhKjdQ YW9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rn13JJrgHc8GUpP/8NT7Oid+2tOpKO2c6rPvQaxWPI82NNBQ3NiYfzOJ6Ln+mZqG0Sd
X-Received: by 10.194.153.199 with SMTP id vi7mr5946217wjb.137.1476344427321; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:720:410:1010:2247:47ff:fedb:3d7e? ([2001:720:410:1010:2247:47ff:fedb:3d7e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v3sm20315713wjm.4.2016.10.13.00.40.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1476344425.3572.3.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, int-dir@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:40:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <77B6CC10-1B17-4265-807F-6B7386C551F8@gmail.com>
References: <77B6CC10-1B17-4265-807F-6B7386C551F8@gmail.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.0-2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/gNVmunpJquGGl8zBvfC0tlKL50Q>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:40:32 -0000

Thanks a lot Jouni.

Carlos

On Wed, 2016-10-12 at 21:00 -0700, jouni.nospam wrote:
> I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-
> default-iids- 15. These comments were written primarily for the
> benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and
> shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat
> comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with
> any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
> details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/director
> ate.html.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15
> Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
> Review Date: 10/12/2016
> IETF LC End Date: --
> IESG Telechat date:  --
> 
> Summary: Ready for publication.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: 
> 
> o The I-D updates RFC4291. Now that there is RFC4291bis work ongoing
> in 6man how that should be handled? I would assume this document
> should actually reference to 4291bis instead of 4291?
> 
> Other comments:
> 
> This document was good read. Nothing to complain. I did review older
> version -15. What I checked -16 did not change anything that would
> affect this review. The IDnits complains quite a bit. However, those
> are bogus errors that IDnits finds.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Int-dir mailing list
> Int-dir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email