IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15

"jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807A71297F4; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XBnTDdXo9YyJ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91FBB1296C0; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 128so29002145pfz.0; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version; bh=MyWUsIqH93AcXjsRGXUPOxP19PJ6Nacfd/ThM6paO6A=; b=tOrFloGbxAidIdMp8LeRTCzI7qyfMwva6y1UdFAgsNux9XwGYrc70oj09I5k9O6IM4 wNFDEYx1N16t2dPZ/o6MXdIprjxMdAb05wlMOQgxNC5W+wmS+Cq4rBCdDsPfhO4KHci6 ZAah7+hJWfTHaEjFsCWMiTBiGmaqEdC8sldBkSiqJet4yRR81qAENicn9Z6ntr4YuyWF LA+a6iqh+QXlJ/WBiFc5GFpwN3QSY3UaUVG1hJYk/VLB1+iAekseO0xf2p3ebUAMIMrX X4At/d9roV1uavC3fEM0L2obxI5G8rcI+43jPZr14hRYuu4885kT5wvYVNkOvdwra9BS 0t5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=MyWUsIqH93AcXjsRGXUPOxP19PJ6Nacfd/ThM6paO6A=; b=g1gPtOkAKvWm9Gs3SSroVbl7cb06W9PY3w2AX5PaxovN9Fab67zcp5nNzVa32sUXWt CdntyYLjKR5dsbrhY8BgY+2nyiBc3SoIvNDuxY7UWjaDhxdwBtrgqyVSFVtBVofnUpHQ wlkUxIZWDOUGoLhhBPCd8YU50PY0pRa/mY51FlKbupyQUglOQDy4biFsqSIlYtrHgU6p YzWRfncYZ2lEPyw5H+YJEs1pMl9Yg7r7VBWoGld5sGCkXBQLJ0pBol3ethSjsJH8oru2 KgpSNRXmQYi4hLRLLsWvVztjbT8Mpu5Raf05kDnxQrEh6EDh0gKvoXMiF2ATkLvPOl3P 8wgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rm90RR5jBr4ZKIaLEz8v68d0t1kOJ+pbkETf5psLHP7BctMhOfax/Y+kWAmHdzwXw==
X-Received: by 10.99.43.8 with SMTP id r8mr5691356pgr.165.1476331223782; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:00:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4200:e520:ec58:db4d:47de:5bed? ([2601:647:4200:e520:ec58:db4d:47de:5bed]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a78sm15172898pfj.44.2016.10.12.21.00.22 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 21:00:21 -0700
Message-Id: <77B6CC10-1B17-4265-807F-6B7386C551F8@gmail.com>
To: int-dir@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/geeHWWCYYckChbTdhZhy2ZW5ejc>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids@ietf.org
Subject: [Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 04:00:26 -0000

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html.

Document: draft-ietf-6man-default-iids- 15
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 10/12/2016
IETF LC End Date: --
IESG Telechat date:  --

Summary: Ready for publication.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: 

o The I-D updates RFC4291. Now that there is RFC4291bis work ongoing in 6man how that should be handled? I would assume this document should actually reference to 4291bis instead of 4291?

Other comments:

This document was good read. Nothing to complain. I did review older version -15. What I checked -16 did not change anything that would affect this review. The IDnits complains quite a bit. However, those are bogus errors that IDnits finds.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email