Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11
"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Wed, 04 November 2020 15:15 UTC
Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CE13A12D1 for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 07:15:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=V5+oe/k+; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=L9ArcWcF
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IrSZv-ovvxPA for <int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 07:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24A583A12C8 for <int-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 07:15:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3610; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604502925; x=1605712525; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8eN0+goDPJpyUtHy54RiijkGaD71CpVQl8iTNvDOc3k=; b=V5+oe/k+RPocNQ5Fn+aGXgL5GzjuzhkwVI61wIScYomnRuLg9+Rt8pzu zfrKSUWJGZ1Ij+uvovVz6NIoUHWHaPoJWNfEFKuITOaRIHFo7CCFkiFkT sjH392X1KoaVuxIr+Mbh8r2LWl/Dm25JDhdNVuHGygrH32MCucKbUDID3 U=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:4hDrWxPAUN845z5p768l6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEvKwx3lDMVITfrflDjrmev6PhXDkG5pCM+DAHfYdXXhAIwcMRg0Q7AcGDBEG6SZyibyEzEMlYElMw+Xa9PBtaHc//YxvZpXjhpTIXEw/0YAxyIOm9E4XOjsOxgua1/ZCbYwhBiDenJ71oKxDjpgTKvc5Qioxneas=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CpEACSxKJf/4gNJK1iHQEBPAEFBQECAQkBFYFRgVApKAdwWS8uhD2DSQONUIoTjmyCUwNUCwEBAQ0BARgLCgIEAQGESgIXgXUCJTgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEcYVhDIVyAQEBBAEBEBERDAEBLAwLBAIBCBEDAQIDAiYCAgIfBgsUAQgIAgQBEiKDBAGCSwMuAQ6kZAKBO4hodoEygwQBAQWCTII6DQuCEAMGgQ4qAYJxg3GBBoVRG4FBP4ERJxyCIS4+ghtCAQGBRxiDFzOCLJNkoz4vVAqCbYkKjGwEhQ8DH4MYjj6BIIM8izuTTYp4gm6SXgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBayOBV3AVOyoBgj5QFwINjlZuAQiCQ4UUhUR0OAIGAQkBAQMJfI1MAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,451,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="601439407"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Nov 2020 15:15:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0A4FF4Lp019486 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:15:22 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:15:16 -0600
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:15:12 -0600
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:15:12 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bqSPXabroZy4vXzhLHhsFuAwpHLwiJ9XQOps1sCgNh4xw08YU+b5/3Mz5h2rmQD5T67hijBz3l7RT7h+nzrjx3JmqvAKh8OV3Uu+wPlT5zgwb1+4/5Mue3sKE8rf1ybXPtAUFt5mOE/8GlqFjHZoMM2rBAqn4RoPWS8M6+iE4U+QuQf653Co53mpNlwfkgJ2mvJ2YcTYQbD9AZ1LqmQHYTogbG94iC8qZxN9mqZVB2yD61kr1yrQfwiiapbqHig+yqviDVqHZj9Hl4Pw1iyMz7JlZvULNZBS+tWdtA60FIWr/0WP7Pl/cutlHsahpM/OSA8NAOQBWI12S0g8xoKc3g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8eN0+goDPJpyUtHy54RiijkGaD71CpVQl8iTNvDOc3k=; b=KJJMoNGjIfst4QnipcO+NEYR4EcXKw6kEbLdsS6fRMkKV+VVmD+4V3hN+S4wJhiBXKsLyzYAUwpQqnxgS71lZJ5wOiuq2YZNPgmzEEEptE9e8a6OySjDfq461T4mXNwC23HNiQ05CqZZ9ct6ZRvuC8P/6HRhMwjBRe0Z8/juqBz0Z6byQ5DaSNChCYxp+HaigtNBBA3ytwm5bzwzVgQbcIm5rEwqX/1RYq9vapO6ZBCpTFgR4BMfX9bAPrr6jSzzrJHysmxz9YyFmOqHrT9Pi7lHFTH913FnOR7Xiy5SIRonS8PMSA9vkjEcvHooJu+iA6p73T4cYBnh77JZ2xfxnw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8eN0+goDPJpyUtHy54RiijkGaD71CpVQl8iTNvDOc3k=; b=L9ArcWcFJn91RxsG1o9+oj2Ot2LueFc9REgPQSKe+FhrjgP0TOWnFKJ37DoK9IEWOV901i3we2egNIGMB8Ymlmb3QR1/Zn2uAfOD1Jqz1RcVT4wdW4URK9lizYDSuLmcVCX4YksXEcahWkj1Vpl3AyW88e4I3bhHUnkohg7O0b4=
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:42::21) by PH0PR11MB5142.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:39::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3499.18; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:14:12 +0000
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d]) by PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3499.032; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 15:14:12 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11
Thread-Index: AQHWoKednGnR2SvxSUCOkylXEwCJBKm4ScCA
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:14:12 +0000
Message-ID: <5A321C45-FDD9-4A5B-B0E1-85DBA64AD13A@cisco.com>
References: <160251443866.28127.2696320816235439108@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160251443866.28127.2696320816235439108@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.42.20101102
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:1140:cf94:e6c:82f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6c7c3c10-c4eb-48f1-97e1-08d880d44927
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PH0PR11MB5142:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PH0PR11MB514201319C052AD6BFCA765CA9EF0@PH0PR11MB5142.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: WEoTt9MMdnjMkZnKZqP9ls5FDNPPHlcozIJgjrJ/44tGamflF2nTp0SlNpyKJMmgvzVp4ZRtvtGWxcrOr4rbneihTeOBqrM0aPMVkknjMuVt3unvndu4J+zcIsH43UqNX1oTJhbtmZqQ17rrQlkB4JHN3nbmsB+1rI/lkWMgdPnNdEPUZf0nkWioh4o5OlrvoLWx5J/+o8Av7vas3NxSlste02VPJpUB87ctU4DgFqW7/SDY/EqFUYekPagUj1J6QsVwTJwIi5l2IUmbJXSEPmufsZtDTGF/q2jvDY9wQCeI8Tp9vdsdQQHXz/RCWg/pRWexqojxGF9eRARtynYtQbcOHWxmPS9P1k/h9vT59CnvLk//rBBnP+buOx+fL37p0sogpRiwrf2pv1w51j2ZsA==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(66446008)(33656002)(6512007)(71200400001)(966005)(5660300002)(36756003)(86362001)(6486002)(83380400001)(316002)(2906002)(66556008)(6506007)(478600001)(91956017)(66946007)(8936002)(66476007)(8676002)(76116006)(110136005)(53546011)(2616005)(64756008)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B15AC2F67587444E86949083CD62F2B8@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6c7c3c10-c4eb-48f1-97e1-08d880d44927
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Nov 2020 15:14:12.0971 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 0DBtKypPQv4FIuiDQuyfTZFhOw9jkwIhrMVgZ7l4z0bShY4ggHbC9aaSVPNLhXQEFbvRnmL73MA7LSj5d0wmXg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR11MB5142
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.14, xch-rcd-004.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/sBf4eQsEM3S7RwOyMT46yotbcbw>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 15:15:27 -0000
[Keeping only int-dir members as recipients] Thank you again Zhen for your review. You may have seen my IESG ballot: I fully second your point about IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses and I even raised it to a block DISCUSS point (BTW, authors are now actively fixed their text ;-) ) Regards -éric -----Original Message----- From: Int-dir <int-dir-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Zhen Cao via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Reply-To: Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 12 October 2020 at 16:54 To: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org> Cc: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery.all@ietf.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org> Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11 Review is partially done. Another assignment may be needed to complete it. Reviewer: Zhen Cao Review result: Ready with Nits Reviewer: Zhen Cao Review result: Ready with Nits Thanks the authors for the document. DOTS server discovery is important to the functioning of the whole system. Important: I read Bernie's eary quick review (saying not a full one) for the 01 version [*] and the comments had been addressed in 02 version. And I think our AD @Eric needs to check if there is a need for further DHC doctor review. (although I checked there were not much changed on the DHCP parts from r02 to r11) . [*]https://github.com/boucadair/draft-ietf-dots-discovery/issues/1 I think most of the other parts looks quite ready except: a) Section 5.1.2 on the configuration of the ipv4-mapped IPv6 address. old: Note, IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (Section 2.5.5.2 of [RFC4291]) are allowed to be included in this option. I do not know why this is particularly mentioned here given there are many types of IPv6 address. I think it 's better to remove this statement since there are many issues configuring IPv4-mapped address directly. Some systems will disable (by default) support for internal IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. Some implementations of dual-stack do not allow IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses to be used for interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6 applications. [RFC4038]. Such discussions do not have to be present here. b) the first sentence of the abstract: s/Districuted/Distributed. _______________________________________________ Int-dir mailing list Int-dir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir
- [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draf… Zhen Cao via Datatracker
- Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)