Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 13 October 2020 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1877C3A0EA8; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=iV0xNknG; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=RacTZ8Fm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkg3xpDhJv3I; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B8063A0E65; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:16:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3256; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1602573405; x=1603783005; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=cBMEPHOMJqdcoOdHd4jbSvpZgdhPz0CI0PHDHj/XUto=; b=iV0xNknGE5YmfW0JCCOxrPd6Oyb6hlX9HN+acpkjBFpHXiOkiSE1rG+x OgABvAJPfpbcVK9Mfj4e/6pjv/AFl/YKv2WtdcPQlUkJZXshpn3kWk4R8 TDiBS8gEzghqJdg60uEPEeq9Lz/07o+FAYMI7kJbiimlYPkcbnQy+PGaK A=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AihDwoBBkY0CGYY1GfaXsUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qw00A3GWIza77RPjO+F+6zjWGlV55GHvThCdZFXTB?= =?us-ascii?q?YKhI0QmBBoG8+KD0D3bZuIJyw3FchPThlpqne8N0UGF8P3ZlmUqXq3vnYeHx?= =?us-ascii?q?zlPl9zIeL4UofZk8Ww0bW0/JveKwVFjTawe/V8NhKz+A7QrcIRx4BlL/U8?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C6EQAjU4Vf/51dJa1gHQEBPAEFBQE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQkBFYFRgVApKAdwWS8shD2DRgONUIoRjmqCUwNVCwEBAQ0BARgLCgIEAQG?= =?us-ascii?q?ESgIXggACJTgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQYEbYVcDIVyAQEBAQMBARAREQwBASw?= =?us-ascii?q?LAQsEAgEIEQMBAgMCJgICAh8GCxQBCAgCBAENBSKDBAGCSwMuAQ6dJwKBOYh?= =?us-ascii?q?hdoEygwEBAQWCTIJCDQuCEAMGgQ4qAYJxg26BBoVQG4FBP4E4HIIfLj6CGkI?= =?us-ascii?q?BAYFHGIMXM4Itk0uTBpATL1IKgmmJAYxdBIUHAx+DFY4qgSCDO4shkySKcYJ?= =?us-ascii?q?skkgCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWsjgVdwFTsqAYI+UBcCDY5WbgEIgkOFFIVCdDcCBgE?= =?us-ascii?q?JAQEDCXyNTAEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,369,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="581015651"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 13 Oct 2020 07:16:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 09D7GiUT029793 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:16:44 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 02:16:43 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 02:16:43 -0500
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 03:16:42 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=clbqdzoniYaDiXrcZDRp4IEHftKSUJ4278IHJ7fXIC1WLFF5nLx1WXxUDODipk03lQr5xx78zaLjSEbXx9EVw8MydvJaeitlDLOgO+PJIEd3o/5ei+YDG1yS5PtWHsf0q+VnjrgfNqNfSiJa/xDOaBpGj/WUS40jJkgh7BHVYmQUkeh2id70/kLe0BPrJari5sBqkyai5xv7HW6T7nCTcDNHt12PCuY2ykIEAsyDYFaqT/cbmQQeFKrcSQC3gIstHgWK9kN9zCUuqMrO5R0F7VKQEQHJqz/+rL7gjy4k4A+aQhp00pKmdLznWXAReBvZtXSdQxMr+hiqeTrPgeuznA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cBMEPHOMJqdcoOdHd4jbSvpZgdhPz0CI0PHDHj/XUto=; b=LQpKIez+jzEcKAa2j3GuagbJfJVdd8J6WrYCvZv4y+TVLPaVoXrXidKEcIusnkJr2/ZuR9ipV4FaMrWTfpgIf+S7h2tncn9Z96tpZm8NEnde/lnm4wux/Pvq9de37/B24TZq/zeIqan5JNvZioM+5DtRS9y8JihC2ASs46jYR77gUdtSpSqEyIlXBg2b+n6BmOPVUh+X+JItHw+KbgSDlDc/Kbdo9QcQ+HZxMCXnsmGWiTyerrhip/VM5EI9cJWoP+WLpEjzNpzGtiJFTnFyTiw+G2d6MDhaKLbsCdyjU4vFlpKGvKiesStJbG0reVpaOWKc4VQvAopEZeKWkR1Mqg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cBMEPHOMJqdcoOdHd4jbSvpZgdhPz0CI0PHDHj/XUto=; b=RacTZ8FmWQ28+QjwT7W9XFu1ifiCX1IJKGDkQoUqGPgKx5H0urRcsoVBOOYBy6UxUpLQe4ygNCfMYcaVJc/zYSv4IJe+gyPunN2wkrJJzQSmKE3GD1va1a6zA3RMT3bIdWUCjiFp/wF+RFDfC9HuBAblqit8KAXVCU3XifJy5JU=
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:42::21) by PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:30::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3455.21; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:16:41 +0000
Received: from PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d]) by PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::453b:b2f5:ec29:410d%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3455.028; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:16:41 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>, "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11
Thread-Index: AQHWoKednGnR2SvxSUCOkylXEwCJBKmVQc8A
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:16:41 +0000
Message-ID: <C5125830-7E27-48B4-A9B0-BFD0795362B7@cisco.com>
References: <160251443866.28127.2696320816235439108@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160251443866.28127.2696320816235439108@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.41.20091302
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:75d3:c2af:badf:ca99]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bfb55e84-bd75-4352-c9a8-08d86f47eedf
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: PH0PR11MB5013:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <PH0PR11MB5013DBC6F682552D87077463A9040@PH0PR11MB5013.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: h/0D0ASACZZK31l7U6XzHPbcgAAsPsyi5OD1XA8EvtuEkRLOIQheIFEylE5bg3oPXjPzosAy58r5jb9O9GelmXpDtRHr0E9wkknhzj9pQRy/m9G1FnyPryMgjt0bZDGIU82sM52rte8ls+eVfP8NDkTEHTjC6Hx0+twIQoIvpSFbZepzgjSebEZPS5F9KzhY9Vr6OOAgmL59IjJrujTjTZNV5a0IcGhDVZ8DBJQGTydby1vmaJuzuZQC9FO9aoaNk+QngEDWN65csx8nq0dta/CcG510wEBHdCE4hEUGYiALRgOAPHbKOaIGF+oJ0fYfPzCFcPzSN52aiUnVasYWCBXpxb0eRUES9f1it82mjvwHh5//Dr69I9QzvV7jJR/9OSJs8gT4bdhpx0wOcSub0Q==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(376002)(366004)(396003)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(2616005)(2906002)(91956017)(76116006)(5660300002)(36756003)(186003)(66556008)(110136005)(53546011)(478600001)(66476007)(966005)(316002)(6506007)(64756008)(66446008)(66946007)(86362001)(83380400001)(4326008)(6512007)(71200400001)(8676002)(8936002)(33656002)(83080400001)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: ptW5ABGIrIZ8MCopES+r9sfW5rQgqaL5v8lyGUeHq8QsPQlSxA3hy0KaQSkrzWnl/+8/I7v5ZRetBVGBq3DitSsFYg51aL2NUxcJiRerSFN4aU9iq6u0GagD+Qti7TR2pwIQjvMIiM+q3i7zeB7I9RCSQbULVj5jIxHxIGVSjwRIh5oMsyD0n7N4D12C6xdvb4MgKDQcfZQ9VdT0jrPPfIinIDARJq2uAJZ1f3YcSf1yXGlH6gkIffz9jmVB0ScEndnYXI4Q7k2kT/s/bpcw5+LaZtdh7DtxUwY8PwoD1QN/KQxcljvD6i4C3lgWTGCtML97KE6qv/zcgXtPcknZIsBrYVllyH0TBROyc6ggEQz8Cqkhv62E5qECM/QpLjCVBQ+TrTJNtPiHHVaoYccjCl091yNPjJyhKzFlOkuCy3LBypEz6+Fzx4nUVCv8R+3gBSaxYMBa8HaVF/jJ4p49Q+a3yERwfkwC5z6uEfDdDCoEZZjZ4sUCwLynyCdYY5hJE75bPvxTP6b7qL/d9ndcebpbgoAhYdYEQ8s0kzcbTH+dWuysCG0s3IHuIYfpuxhFCn+FkcC2SP7BvfTTXDmDDRVES3T+UoxUrPGMxzaOtF1NYfuhoO0I2QgPwb2afjfoQdbiM+ESTYHP5Y3a/m022G7i4cypDEUYNpWm/oXA9PAzeoRyTnf98dDJtuS2/JBtm0dDpE9+Lt/DihL3Ypw4Fw==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <73FEF1B03E715C498BD2B1B6FA646905@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: PH0PR11MB4966.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bfb55e84-bd75-4352-c9a8-08d86f47eedf
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Oct 2020 07:16:41.2774 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: mYKIg2q41P1m8J3M1FzK52I8z7Of1eko+8/Lw+kL2WjVjl+kdJID16dP0a5lqqX9IL3Kk0OzT07urhJW4JyRRA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR11MB5013
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.13, xch-aln-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-6.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/thbdw7ZQ3qQwR-6pw9j8RINgfvw>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 07:16:47 -0000

Thank you Zhen for your review.

-éric

-----Original Message-----
From: Int-dir <int-dir-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Zhen Cao via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Reply-To: Zhen Cao <zhencao.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, 12 October 2020 at 16:54
To: "int-dir@ietf.org" <int-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>rg>, "draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery.all@ietf.org>rg>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir last call partial review of draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-11


    Review is partially done. Another assignment may be needed to complete it.

    Reviewer: Zhen Cao
    Review result: Ready with Nits

    Reviewer: Zhen Cao
    Review result: Ready with Nits

    Thanks the authors for the document.  DOTS server discovery is important to the
    functioning of the whole system.

    Important: I read Bernie's eary quick review (saying not a full one) for the 01
    version [*] and the comments had been addressed in 02 version.   And I think
    our AD @Eric needs to check if there is a need for further DHC doctor review.  
     (although I checked there were not much changed on the DHCP parts from r02 to
    r11) .

    [*]https://github.com/boucadair/draft-ietf-dots-discovery/issues/1

    I think most of the other parts looks quite ready except:
    a) Section 5.1.2 on the configuration of the ipv4-mapped IPv6 address.
    old:    Note, IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses (Section 2.5.5.2 of [RFC4291])  are
    allowed to be included in this option.

    I do not know why this is particularly mentioned here given there are many
    types of IPv6 address.  I think it 's better to remove this statement since
    there are many issues configuring IPv4-mapped address directly.  Some systems
    will disable (by default) support for internal  IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. 
    Some implementations of dual-stack do not allow IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses to
    be used for interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6 applications.  [RFC4038].  
    Such discussions do not have to be present here.

    b) the first sentence of the abstract: s/Districuted/Distributed.



    _______________________________________________
    Int-dir mailing list
    Int-dir@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir