Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles for governance
S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 08 February 2014 00:01 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCCB1AD7C1 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KwVeUPbg-UwT for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E37B1A04C8 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.147.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1801MI3025324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1391817695; bh=leCLblkDw0OWpRlKh9Ig+tCzdLwNeIlnTBtunMvn2M0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=vO7cxo22p+PSsFPtb+9EtQLZBgug6axnIbPNZ3xcSQkhWIWLxkdxe6lB5w/EYr87Q Re8RxEKX8IPbI541hmnzBZr3iEmwkCeMnaWhBN32fBZImleo3lBHCl6GAdismbMlvH gncyK4IwQVJ8pTPUSUzdONbLAGB5YZ9avSos1ptk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1391817695; i=@elandsys.com; bh=leCLblkDw0OWpRlKh9Ig+tCzdLwNeIlnTBtunMvn2M0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=r+Fdt+PwiX2s2iG6BdNFmySkNeLOQOqHjzzbenKVC+AnL324Nul6ASHJ0766FKDCv 1c/V5eNwG3trR9ViKXYjqR2oouuHqHavLUc2ejkd0Z9bbiYjA5XpNA5VUY60mgGCNF DfdkLrF2bzpqK+/5hKqqZl+dD1fXUaUAycGyBsuU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140207151912.0bfaf738@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:51:17 -0800
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F51F18.4040809@gih.com>
References: <52F3784D.8020505@cisco.com> <CAHBU6ivPMJjQrhsOh_dGK6VJnBXPXrvMwkxbX8wU_eWRDTiwTQ@mail.gmail.com> <52F51F18.4040809@gih.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles for governance
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:01:41 -0000
Hi Olivier, At 09:59 07-02-2014, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote: >On the principles of Internet Governance, I'd say the very defence of >the IETF model that is under threat from politically inclined regulators >wishing to put standards building under government supervision is a good >reason to get involved. I have not seen any information to support the argument that the IETF is under threat from politically inclined regulations. I have had discussions with some regulators outside the United States and Europe and I found that they have little awareness of what the IETF does. They did not argue to have IETF standards under government supervision. Internet governance is rife with misunderstandings. There are very few people who take the time to do some fact checking. Regards, S. Moonesamy
- [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles for go… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… ebw
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Tim Bray
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Eric Burger
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… John Levine
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Stephen Botzko
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… S Moonesamy
- [Internetgovtech] interaction meta Re: Discussion… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John Levine
- Re: [Internetgovtech] interaction meta Re: Discus… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] interaction meta Re: Discus… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] interaction meta Re: Discus… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John R Levine
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour David Conrad
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour David Conrad
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phill
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour David Conrad
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles fo… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John C Klensin
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Dave Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Dave Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Dave Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour John C Klensin
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [Internetgovtech] Let's be specific Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Let's be specific Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Dave Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Let's be specific Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] the WCIT detour Larry Masinter