Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles for governance

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 08 February 2014 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCCB1AD7C1 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KwVeUPbg-UwT for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E37B1A04C8 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.147.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1801MI3025324 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 16:01:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1391817695; bh=leCLblkDw0OWpRlKh9Ig+tCzdLwNeIlnTBtunMvn2M0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=vO7cxo22p+PSsFPtb+9EtQLZBgug6axnIbPNZ3xcSQkhWIWLxkdxe6lB5w/EYr87Q Re8RxEKX8IPbI541hmnzBZr3iEmwkCeMnaWhBN32fBZImleo3lBHCl6GAdismbMlvH gncyK4IwQVJ8pTPUSUzdONbLAGB5YZ9avSos1ptk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1391817695; i=@elandsys.com; bh=leCLblkDw0OWpRlKh9Ig+tCzdLwNeIlnTBtunMvn2M0=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=r+Fdt+PwiX2s2iG6BdNFmySkNeLOQOqHjzzbenKVC+AnL324Nul6ASHJ0766FKDCv 1c/V5eNwG3trR9ViKXYjqR2oouuHqHavLUc2ejkd0Z9bbiYjA5XpNA5VUY60mgGCNF DfdkLrF2bzpqK+/5hKqqZl+dD1fXUaUAycGyBsuU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20140207151912.0bfaf738@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:51:17 -0800
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F51F18.4040809@gih.com>
References: <52F3784D.8020505@cisco.com> <CAHBU6ivPMJjQrhsOh_dGK6VJnBXPXrvMwkxbX8wU_eWRDTiwTQ@mail.gmail.com> <52F51F18.4040809@gih.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Discussion of principles for governance
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:01:41 -0000

Hi Olivier,
At 09:59 07-02-2014, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>On the principles of Internet Governance, I'd say the very defence of
>the IETF model that is under threat from politically inclined regulators
>wishing to put standards building under government supervision is a good
>reason to get involved.

I have not seen any information to support the argument that the IETF 
is under threat from politically inclined regulations.  I have had 
discussions with some regulators outside the United States and Europe 
and I found that they have little awareness of what the IETF 
does.  They did not argue to have IETF standards under government supervision.

Internet governance is rife with misunderstandings.  There are very 
few people who take the time to do some fact checking.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy