Re: [iola-conversion-tool] "Intended std level" on Add/Edit screen

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Thu, 23 February 2012 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D5E21F88A1 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:35:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bsi-89k60+MD for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC0C21F888F for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:35:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32797 helo=vigonier.lan ident=henrik) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1S0gKF-0004Yf-8D; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:35:43 +0100
Message-ID: <4F46B12E.1050101@levkowetz.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:35:42 +0100
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk>
References: <4CD06DE3-74CE-42A1-B000-B7C593875EF8@amsl.com> <CANb2Ov+yUwG31SJqHpf4559T3r6x87Hqwe+BvNr1BtL1T8Tw2g@mail.gmail.com> <4F44F940.5040000@levkowetz.com> <4F455380.6060004@nostrum.com> <4F45543E.4090401@levkowetz.com> <CANb2OvJGwSsMqSoifDGSXk5C2ZhppGYBomOkHWLTb7F_-WHaKw@mail.gmail.com> <4F455CBE.1040809@nostrum.com> <CANb2OvKd6P_hjN_Z9-ftiZWwAAeYpPAKHP-mL+BTLYd1ai20uQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANb2OvKd6P_hjN_Z9-ftiZWwAAeYpPAKHP-mL+BTLYd1ai20uQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: olau@iola.dk, rjsparks@nostrum.com, iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] "Intended std level" on Add/Edit screen
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:35:50 -0000

On 2012-02-23 14:18 Ole Laursen said the following:
> 2012/2/22 Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>om>:
>>> Do you think "RFC status" is clear enough once it's not intended anymore?
>>
>> Are you asking what to show on the main document page when you are
>> displaying an RFC? "RFC status" makes sense there. When you're looking at
>> a version of the draft that led to it, I would still say "intended".
> 
> Okay, yes, that's what I was asking. I'll get this fixed.
> 
> 
>> If you're asking about the Edit Info form, we need to be careful - remember
>> that we're going to be adding (very soon now) the ability to issue ballots
>> against changing this status (moving from Proposed to Standard or to Historic
>> for instance), and those are Intended status until approved.
> 
> Right.

Fix deployed.


	Henrik