IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT

Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> Fri, 25 March 2016 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dsr@w3.org>
X-Original-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2776312D5A5 for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H53Oe80TGSBj for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lewis.sophia.w3.org (lewis.sophia.w3.org [193.51.208.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDB4A12D5B2 for <iotsi@iab.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host86-145-168-64.range86-145.btcentralplus.com ([86.145.168.64] helo=macbook-pro.home) by lewis.sophia.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <dsr@w3.org>) id 1ajWCD-0004Kd-5J; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 18:10:53 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DC7CD5C4-7F70-4FED-B93B-01715AD83D0A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <E29201B9-BF4A-4F4E-B335-FE97518C6523@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 18:11:30 +0000
Message-Id: <E55FD81A-79F3-441F-B54E-B4BF4E7F122E@w3.org>
References: <CABCOCHQpj2wMObJUUAFMAQ1xAtdw08ZRQqtaqwMWre_63RQhpQ@mail.gmail.com> <D40BA8183A12B448ACB9448546032E089C935B71@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com> <9ef1d2dac4a347c19f989d9dee5efbd9@QEO00410.de.t-online.corp> <SN1PR0201MB15344A90DBBAACA135F0E61398820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHRN43QZDVMYeEbLEHetfTEio-Y=MiHkAFEga9cZ59ksMA@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534EB82A99FAC915D0876D298820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHTm0kGqU+MjnA4J0OK-tKmVZAPxjmy7i8cQcKax21hDkg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534F8F86D1ED7916176833E98820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <2218A00E-2A48-4498-A667-A6F9DF6AA1BB@yahoo.com> <CD7461FB-FC3C-4341-8B28-467FDA444C1F@w3.org> <E29201B9-BF4A-4F4E-B335-FE97518C6523@yahoo.com>
To: Clarke Stevens <cstevens63@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotsi/C9ZnTDUVcxrvi2VTAKb93mGT0fc>
Cc: "iotsi@iab.org" <iotsi@iab.org>, Ravi Subramaniam <ravi.subramaniam@intel.com>, Michel Kohanim <michel@universal-devices.com>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "Kreuzer, Kai" <k.kreuzer@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT
X-BeenThere: iotsi@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability Workshop <iotsi.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotsi/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotsi@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 18:11:03 -0000

> On 25 Mar 2016, at 17:39, Clarke Stevens <cstevens63@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> For instance, could we agree on standard that enable search engines to index models published via the Web?  
> 
> I believe so.
> 
>> Can we encourage royalty free use of published models? 
> 
> Certainly. This is one thing the OCF is trying to do and is part of the agreement for liaisons where data models are intended to be shared. Some of these have been executed and others are in process.
> 
>> Can we decouple application logic from the complexities of the underlying platforms and protocols?
> 
> Yes. This is one of the goals of OCF. Admittedly, OCF defines how to do this with OCF. It would be even nicer if there were a more universally accepted way.

This is indeed what the W3C hopes to realize with the web of things as an abstraction layer that will work across a wide range of platforms and standards.  

—
   Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email