IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Tue, 22 March 2016 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE5012D8B8 for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i6uQfbfMJhiQ for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36CB412D8DF for <iotsi@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id e196so40721880lfg.1 for <iotsi@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=hp3YbKBz6YShyi6YoSfBIA+nXPoV8MoBcUlL9KmGa90=; b=vLlMtGRWxF8K/6N/DUXavMEAophKpO9WDASk9MCfZYWciDT+OJ0Yf0W9zUYKa70BRk B4x+eAEbpjWLQ40Z4oVrziC84AfqNp7Rw2XHX92K+2mcGgV5DZmc0BPdvhkq9cC0YhkD KXjTasObuLwwUuqp5m2mLnqheJg50+senXdzC5FfVSfJyvPJ7JQtKhXSwss0B0bdghRO PIU4gfN8ENKju9VHiz4eUy0kgru8zz8iqAwgtunOP3QPMg8I1Q0Mcj8sKjB1Rk48d3mn NTbzxclXDua2NUKO0qqi9WQlue09+P88NJOUhwQrVJhuthMrIF1vG8QNp6Df++UDmYM2 3Eng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=hp3YbKBz6YShyi6YoSfBIA+nXPoV8MoBcUlL9KmGa90=; b=kWpz4lednmmHeCXeb6Cm+2R+HODnnRfyxSn9TIyIzMEwMo0Ca4jrB1jKwd9lSfe4U4 46+GliWU9Evk6sjt88In6fEt9FidhICFavXa7597THbM6mU5kmUDXqWsYaFIV/iysJwe AHYGi9lIOm2Cu3kdSDODWC3lsTcfzt1W4bEedm7A38jks6QJTig7VcCJNdSgz67qf0Ug rHrp53Q++gtVlG3CqlV75NHoODVU7Cb913q+DD5ZehgOrU38BiklDydnaNT8f/XDih3B L5MCEBOUxEh4jE2hg3pLRzErILk/4Tst0jDqHEysHd2jJreDmN3UC/4Qgh/mrgaxlpdo JtRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLwjwr3gQU6Q25txoVwksuXu0caGQotgCyus0AiczRNiO/B1lkF5svWbUJbXPMODzsXOHybZX2xAKv9EA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.78.80 with SMTP id c77mr14757002lfb.62.1458667729432; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.135.97 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:28:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQpj2wMObJUUAFMAQ1xAtdw08ZRQqtaqwMWre_63RQhpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: iotsi@iab.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114194e4dbc570052ea68bf0"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotsi/oQUFFFY4Tzp3mK2Pkru8Shr5rPE>
Subject: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT
X-BeenThere: iotsi@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability Workshop <iotsi.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotsi/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotsi@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:29:12 -0000

Hi,

It seems to me that the use-cases discussed at the meeting
assume there is a human with access to UI driving the client.

Does this mean use-cases which do not assume any human interrupts
are possible are not IoT, but something else? In this environment
everything is usually programmed in advance. HATEOAS doesn't
really help here.  It is not likely the client can make decisions
about code-points it has never seen before.

Are there any expectations that IoT includes programmatic clients
or is it just for interactive clients?


Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email