IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-05.txt

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 08 November 2012 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA16B21F87E6 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:58:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.068, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khjkokPIc4Mm for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:58:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (av-tac-rtp.cisco.com [64.102.19.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4744C21F87E5 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 07:58:48 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA8FwhsH018902; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:58:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.82.236.201] (rtp-vpn5-1221.cisco.com [10.82.236.201]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA8Fwhci018873; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 10:58:43 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <509BD6B3.3030700@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:58:43 -0500
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gerhard Muenz <muenz@net.in.tum.de>
References: <506CBFE3.10607@auckland.ac.nz> <5090547C.5020803@cisco.com> <F37F4EC6-E7AB-4975-93A7-82B7CDCD13EF@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <5091271E.3050206@cisco.com> <68907E1B-1D38-4F3A-B0E0-F47628F989F0@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <50913BF3.2080408@cisco.com> <8ED0D683-536C-46B6-8E5A-3CC3B7CB678F@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <5091422B.9070607@cisco.com> <48C58B9E-EE52-415D-896F-AA15F8B7A6C4@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <5092AE87.6040400@cisco.com> <BE38C2E3-78A9-42A2-9214-45CD5819E790@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <50981A52.2050104@net.in.tum.de>
In-Reply-To: <50981A52.2050104@net.in.tum.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-05.txt
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:58:49 -0000

On 5/11/2012 14:58, Gerhard Muenz wrote:
>
> Hi Paul, Brian,
>
>>> So, how about "A delta counter only counts observations made since 
>>> the previous Flow Record (if any) for a given Flow."
>
> This statement seems sufficiently clear and sufficiently flexible.
That works for me

Regards, Benoit (as a contributor)
> For example, as I understand it, it does not imply that all 
> observations since the previous Flow Record must be counted. Some 
> observations might get lost or omitted on purpose. Also, at some time, 
> the next interval will end, so the following observations are not 
> counted. Also, it does not imply that the Flow Record is actually 
> exported.
>
> Regards,
> Gerhard
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email