[IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring status
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 24 December 2013 11:06 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C221AD83F for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:06:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JThCC-c0zPmh for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76D81A802A for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:06:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=675; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1387883161; x=1389092761; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EX3/0h0Hql3XJBPjuRbQ2pPucH6B2eDAL5NKW+EDPo8=; b=mFRwAet1XS2pFJnLIZMdHgsw6EJXHojGR6Asucoyj803GfB7va6HZ+hi Qg10c7CfGqLevAeONogPX/BbXXW0gCJXasBYtYCppkagk8NoYu9QvwiEC 1TscNqBW5rNMbuzafhwjpQznlw9yGjdOZJwJbnUPzJo7bYEFepgsQSP83 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFANxpuVKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgws4ulCBHRZ0giYBAQQ4QAEQLBYPCQMCAQIBRRMBBwEBiAANymkTBI8bBxaEIAEDmBeGRYtPgy47
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,542,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="8835132"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2013 11:06:01 +0000
Received: from [10.82.235.103] (rtp-vpn5-868.cisco.com [10.82.235.103]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBOB5xp8023548; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:06:00 GMT
Message-ID: <52B96A97.1030408@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 12:05:59 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring@tools.ietf.org
References: <52A5975A.7000900@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52A5975A.7000900@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <52A5975A.7000900@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring status
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:06:06 -0000
Dear authors, A gentle reminder that this draft is in "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed" for 33 days See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring/ This state is a new state that the IESG implemented recently to improve the speed of documents delivery. It means that the document is approved, but that agreed changes should be included in a new version before the draft goes in the RFC editor queue. However, 33 days in that state is way too long in my opinion, and defeats the purpose of this new document state. If you don't know what to do, let the document shepherd or me know. Regards, Benoit
- [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitori… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-moni… Paul Aitken