IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring status

Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Tue, 24 December 2013 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <paitken@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02C71ADF4E for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:52:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c_xa49nlN0Au for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:52:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D181ADF23 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 05:52:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1145; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1387893157; x=1389102757; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=671gMfNZdqZPtBIH5QmzarORrZK3zOMvndsXvFnzlCI=; b=C6nAkyq0OUJHeeHSjeslfBbJc0PZFB1rppuqouVk7Sh7q5Skgf1l69np tDyDH/42jxnaab75+vZqD+WOSoLOt7gUVimLy2bt9nN9x9w+6zHMrjctY vPupeZM/8k49PWZbbx1oNq1zHdsmK6LqBzcaBj1+Gz8/R50aacyoWCwL3 o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,543,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="2051443"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2013 13:52:36 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBODqaYi031705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:52:36 GMT
Received: from [10.21.69.138] (sjc-vpn3-1418.cisco.com [10.21.69.138]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id rBODqYCU024044; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:52:35 GMT
Message-ID: <52B9919D.1090609@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 06:52:29 -0700
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring@tools.ietf.org
References: <52A5975A.7000900@cisco.com> <52B96A97.1030408@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52B96A97.1030408@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring status
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:52:43 -0000

Benoit,

Thanks for this (second) reminder.

As I told you before, I will work on this document during the holidays. 
We have discussed the reasons for that many times.

I'm connected <7am on Christmas Eve for this specific purpose.

P.


On 24/12/2013 04:05, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Dear authors,
>
> A gentle reminder that this draft is in "Approved-announcement to be 
> sent::Revised I-D Needed" for 33 days
> See 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring/
> This state is a new state that the IESG implemented recently to 
> improve the speed of documents delivery.
> It means that the document is approved, but that agreed changes should 
> be included in a new version before the draft goes in the RFC editor 
> queue.
> However, 33 days in that state is way too long in my opinion, and 
> defeats the purpose of this new document state.
> If you don't know what to do, let the document shepherd or me know.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email