Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London

Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Mon, 10 February 2014 22:49 UTC

Message-ID: <52F95765.50902@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:49:09 +0000
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, Andrew Feren <andrewf@plixer.com>, IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
References: <52EF4E92.3040906@auckland.ac.nz> <52EF71FA.3090005@cisco.com> <52F80BCA.2030408@auckland.ac.nz> <52F8AAB5.5050604@cisco.com> <52F9430C.3040909@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F9430C.3040909@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ipfix-ads@tools.ietf.org" <ipfix-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London
Precedence: list

Benoit,

>> I've presented these ideas in previous WG meetings, where the 
>> consensus was to wait for the next re-charter.
> Consensus, sure?

Yes: the work was interesting, but not relevant to the current charter. 
So, bring it up at the next recharter - which hasn't happened yet.


> I checked the meeting minutes and I don't see that.
> What I recall is that two different proposals were discussed 
> (draft-aitken-ipfix-equivalent-ies and draft-inacio-ipfix-penie-00), 
> with no clear winner.

Sure; each of these drafts has different merits. It would be up to the 
WG to decide on the best solution.

Look, here's a real problem in IPFIX which has resulted in not one but 
*two* different drafts trying to solve it in different ways. Do you 
propose to ignore it?

P.

[IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Nevil Brownlee
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Paul Aitken
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Andrew Feren
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Nevil Brownlee
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Paul Aitken
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Brian Trammell
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London joel jaeggli
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Brian Trammell
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Nevil Brownlee
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Benoit Claise
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Paul Aitken
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Benoit Claise
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Juergen Quittek
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Andrew Feren
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Juergen Quittek
Re: [IPFIX] IPFIX at IETF 89, London Benoit Claise