Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07.txt
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 13:56 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4B411E8198 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:56:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9ObKdRI+2NY for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF7111E80EC for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:56:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10474; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383659808; x=1384869408; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=Yb5fMT4mQqyYJT/bEqnruV1IS9So90rOrVUroXrp9l4=; b=fGA1iTq6Bmg+Q0dGI0CR3dAUkROyFkHlgyt5bKyhtxDINpBv91rlWJM9 tsQ1cLTYC7Ea43JxrXiQvV6ZPGAa6086vZpMKVqvHpq0bD2d4IwylFW1t 4zEOCH0+TcM5jLzr7u00VyjlR22D7/WHBLkPR3p3EuF9Py1e6X/rlFWag I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,640,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="94108460"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2013 13:56:47 +0000
Received: from [10.21.81.48] (sjc-vpn4-304.cisco.com [10.21.81.48]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA5DujrS030992; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:56:45 GMT
Message-ID: <5278F91D.80609@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 05:56:45 -0800
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
References: <20131104130718.10097.9955.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5277A0FE.8020000@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5277A0FE.8020000@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010603060402080407000208"
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:56:53 -0000
On 4/11/2013 05:28, Paul Aitken wrote: > Dear IPFIXers, > > This is a minor update to address the issues reported by Ben Campbell > in his Gen-ART review. > > Specifically: > > * changed the 3rd paragraph of the intro to clarify that: > > ... the PSAMP > Information Model [RFC5477] and the IPFIX Information Model [RFC7011] > don't yet contain enough Information Elements related to data link > layer, > > * corrected 3.2.18. droppedL2OctetTotalCount to define a total > counter rather than a delta counter: > > Description: > > The total number of octets in observed layer 2 packets (including > the layer 2 header) that were dropped by packet treatment since > the (re-)initialization of the Metering Process. > > * I also took the opportunity to make some small formatting changes to > Figures 1, 2, and 3 in section 6, to avoid idnits complaining that > Figure 3 is overly wide, and to keep Figures 1 and 2 in sync. > > > * One issue remains from Ben's review: > > It looks like this draft updates at least RFC5477. If so, this should be indicated in the header and in the abstract. > > > Our view is that IANA's IPFIX registry is now the ultimate reference, > so we don't constantly have to be referring back to old RFCs in each > new draft. That makes sense since RFC 7012 mentions that IANA registry is now THE reference The IANA "IPFIX Information Elements" registry [IANA-IPFIX] is the current complete reference for IPFIX Information Elements. The IE-doctors collectively agreed that updating the OLD is not needed, and they will consistently apply this rule for future IEs I thought I would let the IPFIX community know. Regards, Benoit > > TBD. > > P. > > > On 04/11/2013 13:07, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. >> This draft is a work item of the IP Flow Information Export Working Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : Information Elements for Data Link Layer Traffic Measurement >> Author(s) : Shingo Kashima >> Atsushi Kobayashi >> Paul Aitken >> Filename : draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07.txt >> Pages : 34 >> Date : 2013-11-04 >> >> Abstract: >> This document describes Information Elements related to the data link >> layer. They are used by the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) >> protocol for encoding measured data link layer traffic information. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IPFIX mailing list >> IPFIX@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix > > > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > IPFIX@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
- [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-la… internet-drafts
- Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-lin… Paul Aitken
- Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-lin… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-lin… Paul Aitken