Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07.txt

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 05 November 2013 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4B411E8198 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:56:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9ObKdRI+2NY for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF7111E80EC for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 05:56:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10474; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383659808; x=1384869408; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=Yb5fMT4mQqyYJT/bEqnruV1IS9So90rOrVUroXrp9l4=; b=fGA1iTq6Bmg+Q0dGI0CR3dAUkROyFkHlgyt5bKyhtxDINpBv91rlWJM9 tsQ1cLTYC7Ea43JxrXiQvV6ZPGAa6086vZpMKVqvHpq0bD2d4IwylFW1t 4zEOCH0+TcM5jLzr7u00VyjlR22D7/WHBLkPR3p3EuF9Py1e6X/rlFWag I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.93,640,1378857600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="94108460"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2013 13:56:47 +0000
Received: from [10.21.81.48] (sjc-vpn4-304.cisco.com [10.21.81.48]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA5DujrS030992; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 13:56:45 GMT
Message-ID: <5278F91D.80609@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 05:56:45 -0800
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
References: <20131104130718.10097.9955.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5277A0FE.8020000@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5277A0FE.8020000@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010603060402080407000208"
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:56:53 -0000

On 4/11/2013 05:28, Paul Aitken wrote:
> Dear IPFIXers,
>
> This is a minor update to address the issues reported by Ben Campbell 
> in his Gen-ART review.
>
> Specifically:
>
> * changed the 3rd paragraph of the intro to clarify that:
>
>     ... the PSAMP
>     Information Model [RFC5477] and the IPFIX Information Model [RFC7011]
>     don't yet contain enough Information Elements related to data link
>     layer,
>
> * corrected 3.2.18.  droppedL2OctetTotalCount to define a total 
> counter rather than a delta counter:
>
>     Description:
>
>        The total number of octets in observed layer 2 packets (including
>        the layer 2 header) that were dropped by packet treatment since
>        the (re-)initialization of the Metering Process.
>
> * I also took the opportunity to make some small formatting changes to 
> Figures 1, 2, and 3 in section 6, to avoid idnits complaining that 
> Figure 3 is overly wide, and to keep Figures 1 and 2 in sync.
>
>
> * One issue remains from Ben's review:
>
>     It looks like this draft updates at least RFC5477. If so, this should be indicated in the header and in the abstract.
>
>
> Our view is that IANA's IPFIX registry is now the ultimate reference, 
> so we don't constantly have to be referring back to old RFCs in each 
> new draft.

That makes sense since RFC 7012 mentions that IANA registry is now THE 
reference

    The IANA "IPFIX Information Elements" registry [IANA-IPFIX] is the
    current complete reference for IPFIX Information Elements.

The IE-doctors collectively agreed that updating the OLD is not needed, 
and they will consistently apply this rule for future IEs
I thought I would let the IPFIX community know.

Regards, Benoit
>
> TBD.
>
> P.
>
>
> On 04/11/2013 13:07, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>   This draft is a work item of the IP Flow Information Export Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>> 	Title           : Information Elements for Data Link Layer Traffic Measurement
>> 	Author(s)       : Shingo Kashima
>>                            Atsushi Kobayashi
>>                            Paul Aitken
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07.txt
>> 	Pages           : 34
>> 	Date            : 2013-11-04
>>
>> Abstract:
>>     This document describes Information Elements related to the data link
>>     layer.  They are used by the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
>>     protocol for encoding measured data link layer traffic information.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-07
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IPFIX mailing list
>> IPFIX@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix