Re: [IPFIX] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-statement

Hi Dan, and Chairs,

The issues are being discussed in another mail.

I am wondering non-technical issue that problem statement 
needs normative reference to framework.

Regards,
Atsushi

On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:51:24 +0200
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> wrote:

> Editors and Chairs,
> 
> Please address the issue raised by Sean in his DISCUSS. 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Sean Turner
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 6:51 AM
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org;
> ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-statement 
> 
> Discuss:
> #1) The SECDIR review pointed out that the trust model needs to be
> explained.   Atsushi suggested that there were two scenarios and they
> should probably go in the follow-on framework document.  If that is the
> case, then a normative reference is needed to point from the trust model
> text/section to that particular section in the framework document.
> However, the -06 of draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-framework does not seem
> to include this text.  Is it going to be included or is the trust model
> going to be included in problem-statement?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix

--- 
Atsushi KOBAYASHI  <akoba@nttv6.net>
NTT Information Sharing Platform Lab.
tel:+81-(0)422-59-3978 fax:+81-(0)422-59-5637