Re: [IPFIX] FW: DISCUSS: draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-problem-statement

[Atsushi Kobayashi <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dan, and all,

In IETF last call, the SECDIR review pointed out that the trust model
for mediator needs to be explained. At that time, I explained about my
thought included in framework draft.

In IESG review, Sean pointed out two comments; the current framework
draft is not enough explanation, the problem statement document needs
the normative reference to the framework draft.

With regard to framework document, thanks to Brian great suggestion, I
am preparing next version including trust model in security
consideration section. Please see the following sub-section 9.3.
http://www.nttv6.net/~akoba/draft-ietf-ipfix-mediators-framework-07-01.html#anchor24

With regard to including normative reference to framework, I have
one question. By definition, the goal of problem statement is to explain
the issues that should be resolved in a series of documents made
afterward, i.e., framework. It is starting point.
Thus, already the problem statement described the issues about the trust
model. In my opinion, it is enough as problem statement level.

Even so, normative reference is necessary?
Does it need to wait for framework draft?
If framework has normative reference to its protocol, does it need to
wait protocol draft moreover?

I would like to avoid long discussion about it, I will follow your and
IPFIX chairs' opinion.

Regards,
Atsushi


On Mon, 10 May 2010 09:43:55 +0200
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Atsushi Kobayashi [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> 
> > 
> > I am wondering non-technical issue that problem statement 
> > needs normative reference to framework.
> > 
> 
> Can you try to reformulate this, I cannot really understand what you
> mean. 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 

--- 
Atsushi KOBAYASHI  <[e-mail]>
NTT Information Sharing Platform Lab.
tel:[phone] fax:[phone]