Re: [IPFIX] [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities registry
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Mon, 22 September 2014 12:25 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4BC1A1AAC; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 05:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYqydeRgtire; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 05:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12D3F1A1AB3; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 05:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3393; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1411388719; x=1412598319; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfRB/HC1DsXv4/557YY+jqGSzN/mNxmIFpcoKX3ZvHw=; b=exdPiBxBrXiFLsrs0/p64/7Mn/P9pBlaVzqswlhdcYDm6cDPuS0jssU8 X1V/aGvQrhP1A5aUumgob4IqNaLFJ8DMkyj1CuSFu8EVgsSkVn/LHjjFk Uk2Tjx9t+ZJwggshS+9gKRDhmeTAuwhj2yjlYh+VAUYb26ACg5BWfPfAf E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswUALgUIFStJssW/2dsb2JhbABdA4NhV8pKCguHPQMCAYEhAXmEAwEBAQQBAQEvAQUzAwoBDAICCxEEAQEBCRYIBwkDAgECAQkMHwkIBgEMAQUCAQGIJgMRDbxXCIc0ARMEBI8gEQFAEAcGC4Q6AQSdFodMhQKJBIIegUU7L4EPgTsBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,571,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="185394664"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Sep 2014 12:25:17 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8MCPH5O024936; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:25:17 GMT
Message-ID: <5420152C.2060501@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:25:16 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietfdbh <ietfdbh@comcast.net>, "'t.petch'" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, 'Loa Andersson' <loa@pi.nu>, 'Gregory Mirsky' <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>, ipfix@ietf.org
References: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B82E898@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <541BF749.6010907@pi.nu> <004a01cfd3ff$da773380$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <061e01cfd554$bfe4dd50$3fae97f0$@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <061e01cfd554$bfe4dd50$3fae97f0$@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/esF3iQ5dkHqHb8R-6di0MplTlJY
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, "'MIB Doctors (E-mail)'" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities registry
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:25:21 -0000
We could argue whether the semantic was actually changed since the EXP bits were used for QoS. Anyway, let's quote Jürgen: "The question is whether doing this is worth anything.". I'm not convinced... Regards, Benoit > Updating the description would be a problem if you change the semantics of > the object. > > David Harrington > ietfdbh@comcast.net > +1-603-828-1401 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: MIB-DOCTORS [mailto:mib-doctors-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> t.petch >> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 7:50 AM >> To: Loa Andersson; Gregory Mirsky; ipfix@ietf.org >> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; MIB Doctors (E-mail) >> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Information >> Export (IPFIX) Entities registry >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.nu> >> To: "Gregory Mirsky" <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>; <ipfix@ietf.org> >> Cc: <mpls@ietf.org>; "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org> >> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 10:28 AM >> >> Greg, >> >> I'm not sure about this - would changing the names require updating all >> existing deployed MIBs? >> >> <tp> >> >> Yes. See RFC2578 s.10. You cannot reuse an OID so this would need a new >> OID; messy, best left as one of those quaint, historic anomalies that >> litter our work. >> >> Updating the DESCRIPTION and REFERENCE is not a problem (but issuing >> any MIB module is a lot of work). >> >> Tom Petch >> [not a MIB doctor] >> >> >> >> >> Can we get an mib doctor advice on this? >> >> /Loa >> >> On 2014-09-10 21:22, Gregory Mirsky wrote: >>> Dear All, >>> >>> in several places of describing MPLS Label element IEs the registry >>> still refers to the EXP field even though the RFC 5462 updated RFC >> 3032 >>> and renamed it "Traffic Class" (TC). Below is the list of IEs that may >>> benefit from updating Description and Reference information: >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection2 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection3 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection4 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection5 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection6 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection7 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection8 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection9 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelStackSection10 >>> >>> .mplsTopLabelExp (should this be deprecated and mplsTopLabelTc be >>> created instead?) >>> >>> .postMplsTopLabelExp (should this be deprecated and postMplsTopLabelTc >>> be created instead?) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Greg >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mpls mailing list >>> mpls@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >>> >> -- >> >> >> Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >> Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >> Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mpls mailing list >> mpls@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list >> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > _______________________________________________ > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list > MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > . >
- [IPFIX] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Information Ex… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [IPFIX] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Informatio… Andrew Feren
- Re: [IPFIX] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Informatio… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Andrew Feren
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] [Ie-doctors] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Andrew Feren
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] [SPAM I AM] RE: MPLS IEs in IANA's IP… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [IPFIX] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Informatio… Paul Aitken
- Re: [IPFIX] [Ie-doctors] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Fl… Brian Trammell
- Re: [IPFIX] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Inf… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [IPFIX] [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [IPFIX] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA's IP Flow Inf… Loa Andersson
- Re: [IPFIX] [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA… ietfdbh
- Re: [IPFIX] [MIB-DOCTORS] [mpls] MPLS IEs in IANA… Benoit Claise