Re: [IPFIX] DRAFT agenda for IETF in Anaheim

Atsushi Kobayashi <akoba@nttv6.net> Wed, 03 March 2010 04:12 UTC

Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:07:11 +0900
From: Atsushi Kobayashi <akoba@nttv6.net>
To: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <4B8DC1E0.4070909@auckland.ac.nz>
References: <20100226132551.405B.17391CF2@nttv6.net> <4B8DC1E0.4070909@auckland.ac.nz>
Message-Id: <20100303125436.40F3.17391CF2@nttv6.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] DRAFT agenda for IETF in Anaheim
Precedence: list

Hi Nevil,

On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:56:48 +1300
Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:

> 
> Hi Atsushi:
> 
> 1) OK, I've added this to the Anaheim agenda.
> 

Thank you! Kashima-san will present it.

> 2) Your draft says 'Standards Track,' but independent submissions can
>     only be Informational or Experimental.  Standards Track drafts need
>     to become a WG item ... let's discuss it further in Anaheim.
> 

Yes, let's discuss also how to progress it.
I do not adhere to "Standards Track". Our goal is to register new
Information Elements for data link frame into IANA. If we achieve it, it
does not matter.

> 3) As you've reminded me below, I'll post some comments real soon now!

I am looking forward to your comments.

Regards,
Atsushi

> 
> Cheers, Nevil
> 
> 
> Atsushi Kobayashi wrote:
> > Hi Nevil, and all,
> > 
> > We are preparing the next version draft of new information element for
> > link layer monitoring. 
> > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-kashima-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-01.txt
> > 
> > In last meeting, we discussed how to progress it furthermore.
> > Please see minute of last meeting.
> > 
> >           New Drafts
> >              Data-link Layer Monitoring, Shingo Kashima.
> >                Proposes to make 3 new IEs?
> >                dataLinkFrameType - why not use ifType (from RMON) for values.
> >                Juergen says "since Ethernet is so common, this should be
> >                documented in an RFC."  Could be an Independent Submission.
> >                Dan agrees we need a more detailed draft, discussed on WG.
> >                Nevil will send some comments to the authors.
> > 
> > I and Kashima-san would like to have 5 or 10 minutes to present the
> > update in IPFIX WG. But, I am not sure how to progress it. Should it be
> > presented at another working group, or independent submission? 
> > Will you give me any suggestion about it?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Atsushi
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Nevil Brownlee                    Computer Science Department | ITS
>   Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941             The University of Auckland
>   FAX: +64 9 373 7453   Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
> 

--- 
Atsushi KOBAYASHI  <akoba@nttv6.net>
NTT Information Sharing Platform Lab.
tel:+81-(0)422-59-3978 fax:+81-(0)422-59-5637

[IPFIX] DRAFT agenda for IETF in Anaheim Nevil Brownlee
Re: [IPFIX] DRAFT agenda for IETF in Anaheim Atsushi Kobayashi
Re: [IPFIX] DRAFT agenda for IETF in Anaheim Nevil Brownlee
Re: [IPFIX] DRAFT agenda for IETF in Anaheim Atsushi Kobayashi