[IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5101 (2814)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 24 May 2011 10:03 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE98E0681 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.313, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gozu1c76cE3Y for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E648FE0675 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DF6FAE0701; Tue, 24 May 2011 03:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: bclaise@cisco.com, dromasca@avaya.com, rbonica@juniper.net, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, quittek@neclab.eu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110524100259.DF6FAE0701@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 03:02:59 -0700
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ipfix@ietf.org
Subject: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5101 (2814)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:03:01 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5101, "Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5101&eid=2814 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- exportedFlowTotalCount The total number of Flow Records that the Exporting Process successfully sent to the Collecting Process since the Exporting Process re-initialization. Corrected Text -------------- exportedFlowRecordTotalCount The total number of Flow Records that the Exporting Process successfully sent to the Collecting Process since the Exporting Process re-initialization. Notes ----- The exportedFlowRecordTotalCount Information Element (42) is incorrectly referenced in the text in this section as exportedFlowTotalCount. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5101 (draft-ietf-ipfix-protocol-26) -------------------------------------- Title : Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic Flow Information Publication Date : January 2008 Author(s) : B. Claise, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Flow Information Export Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5101 (2814) RFC Errata System