Re: musings

William Chops Westfield <billw@cisco.com> Thu, 16 May 1996 23:01 UTC

Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27344; 16 May 96 19:01 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27340; 16 May 96 19:01 EDT
Received: from zephyr.isi.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05790; 16 May 96 19:01 EDT
Received: by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-23) id <AA11729>; Thu, 16 May 1996 15:45:07 -0700
Received: from venera.isi.edu by zephyr.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-23) id <AA11723>; Thu, 16 May 1996 15:45:06 -0700
Received: from puli.cisco.com by venera.isi.edu (5.65c/5.61+local-23) id <AA21695>; Thu, 16 May 1996 15:45:05 -0700
Received: (billw@localhost) by puli.cisco.com (8.6.8+c/8.6.5) id PAA16694; Thu, 16 May 1996 15:45:01 -0700
Date: Thu, 16 May 96 15:45:00 PDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: William Chops Westfield <billw@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Cc: Robert Elz <kre@munnari.oz.au>, rreq@isi.edu
Subject: Re: musings
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 16 May 1996 15:20:53 -0700
Message-Id: <CMM.0.90.2.832286700.billw@puli.cisco.com>
X-Orig-Sender: owner-rreq@isi.edu
Precedence: bulk

Of course, RFC1122/23 weren't an unqualified success either.  It's shown up
in RFPs, but you can still find plenty of implementations that are broken in
serious ways (according to RFC1122/23) that the vendors seem to have little
interest in correcting.

BillW