Re: turf war!
Andy Malis <malis@bbn.com> Fri, 12 March 1993 17:55 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05523; 12 Mar 93 12:55 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05519; 12 Mar 93 12:55 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13330; 12 Mar 93 12:54 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05495; 12 Mar 93 12:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05491; 12 Mar 93 12:54 EST
Received: from OAKLAND.BBN.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13309; 12 Mar 93 12:54 EST
To: Robert L Ullmann <ULLMANN@process.com>
cc: iplpdn@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, malis@bbn.com
Subject: Re: turf war!
In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 11 Mar 93 15:50:00 -0500. <9303111555.aa21722@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 12:50:16 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iplpdn-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Andy Malis <malis@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <9303121254.aa13309@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Robert wrote: > Serious note: the action of CCITT and ISO in recognizing the CC > code point was (is) an extremely important step in the political > process. One of the objectives of RFC1356 was to clearly recognize > and acknowledge this un-precedented recognition by the JTC. For the > PPP people to go demand C0 would (IMHO) be very offensive. I couldn't have said it better myself. Either Bill's latest I-Ds are just a bad joke, or we have a serious problem to escalate to the IESG. Andy P.S. Starting Monday, my email address is malis_a@timeplex.com
- turf war! Keith Sklower
- RE: turf war! Robert L Ullmann
- Re: turf war! Fred Baker
- Re: turf war! Andy Malis