IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Adoption Call for draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-method

"STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <bs7652@att.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4399E1209CD for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:43:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAl2nLVkFhNn for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1163F120AE8 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:43:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0048589.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAK2ZPXX036938 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:43:30 -0500
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2wcm215sn1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:43:30 -0500
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xAK2hSt3008736 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:43:28 -0500
Received: from zlp30485.vci.att.com (zlp30485.vci.att.com [135.47.91.178]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id xAK2hObk008688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:43:24 -0500
Received: from zlp30485.vci.att.com (zlp30485.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30485.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 58A3C400AE37 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:43:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com (unknown [130.8.218.155]) by zlp30485.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTPS id 464D8400AE35 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:43:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.5.43]) by GAALPA1MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.218.155]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:43:23 -0500
From: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
To: 'IETF IPPM WG' <ippm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [ippm] Adoption Call for draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-method
Thread-Index: AQHVncREji9T8nXIg0WrwBp/McPTrqeTWUYg
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:43:22 +0000
Message-ID: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611536E7B3F@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <6B233CAB-7D88-4258-8C8D-BCA99E4E3C48@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <6B233CAB-7D88-4258-8C8D-BCA99E4E3C48@trammell.ch>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.211.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-19_08:2019-11-15,2019-11-19 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=778 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911200022
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/0jtp1yQd_MvaQwFDQp8ZkVBM8FY>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption Call for draft-morton-ippm-capacity-metric-method
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:43:42 -0000

> The IPPM working group has been asked to adopt draft-morton-ippm-
> capacity-metric-method-01 as as a working group document.
> 
> This message begins an adoption call to end on Monday 9 December 2019.
> Please send a message to ippm@ietf.orgindicating:
> 
> - whether you believe the draft is in scope for the WG and mature enough to
> be a WG document, and if not, why not
> - whether you are willing to review the document

I've scanned through the document and find it well-organized, very readable, and has most of the info I was hoping to find. I've also run these tests on my gigabit broadband connection at home -- and they work great!
I would like to understand plans for creation of one or more Performance Metrics registry entries (should registry entries be specified? should this draft specify registry entries?).
I think the doc is in scope and mature, and am willing to review (in more detail than my quick scan).
I support adoption.
Barbara

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email