[ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (4260)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 04 July 2016 20:46 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A49212D126; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xbm-geH9EpSL; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B87B312D124; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A45C8B8028F; Mon, 4 Jul 2016 13:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com, acmorton@att.com, lencia@att.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160704204628.A45C8B8028F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 13:46:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/7kA1OstSAOtiCHY_wTZqVknmbBM>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ippm@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (4260)
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 20:46:30 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC6038, "Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6038&eid=4260 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Huck Zhao <Huck.Zhao@alcatel-lucent.com> Date Reported: 2015-02-04 Verified by: Spencer Dawkins (IESG) Section: 5.2.1 Original Text ------------- ... When the Reflect Octets mode is selected, the Session-Sender SHALL use the following TWAMP-Test Packet Format in Unauthenticated mode: It should be Session-Reflector that SHALL use the following format. Corrected Text -------------- ... When the Reflect Octets mode is selected, the Session-Reflector SHALL use the following TWAMP-Test Packet Format in Unauthenticated mode: Notes ----- I confirmed this with Al Morton via e-mail. -------------------------------------- RFC6038 (draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-reflect-octets-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Reflect Octets and Symmetrical Size Features Publication Date : October 2010 Author(s) : A. Morton, L. Ciavattone Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Performance Metrics Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [ippm] [Errata Verified] RFC6038 (4260) RFC Errata System
- [ippm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6038 (4260) RFC Errata System